» Articles » PMID: 8977439

Pregnancy Induces an Increase in Angiotensin II Type-1 Receptor Expression in Uterine but Not Systemic Artery Endothelium

Overview
Journal Endocrinology
Specialty Endocrinology
Date 1997 Jan 1
PMID 8977439
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

During pregnancy, the uterine artery demonstrates refractoriness to vasoconstriction by infused angiotensin II (AII). AII increases prostacyclin (PGI2) production by uterine artery endothelium from pregnant ewes, and this response is mediated via the AT1 receptor (AT1-R). This response is also unique to pregnancy because AII does not stimulate PGI2 production by uterine artery endothelium from nonpregnant ewes. We therefore hypothesize that the increase in uterine artery PGI2 production in response to AII in pregnancy is associated in part with a concomitant increase in AT1-R expression in uterine artery endothelium. Endothelium-derived protein was directly removed from the lumenal surface of freshly isolated uterine and systemic (omental) arteries from nonpregnant and pregnant ewes. AT1-R expression was then measured in both the endothelium-derived fraction and endothelium-denuded vascular smooth muscle (VSM) fraction by Western analysis. AT1-R was detected as 54- and 65-kDa proteins in all samples, as well as adrenal cortex control. AT1-R expression increased more than 8-fold in uterine artery endothelium of pregnant ewes over that in nonpregnant ewes at each of four gestational ages (P < 0.05 at 110, 120, 130, 142 days, n = 4 each vs. n = 6 nonpregnant). No significant differences were seen, however, from 110 to 142 days of gestation. In contrast, whereas the level of AT1-R staining in omental artery endothelium in nonpregnant ewes was higher than in uterine artery, AT1-R increased less in pregnant ewes (2-fold) and only reached significance over nonpregnant values at 110 and 120 days, or when data was combined irrespective of gestational age (P < 0.05). Although AT1-R was also detected in uterine and omental artery VSM, little or no change in expression was observed in pregnancy. Results were confirmed by immunohistochemical staining of arterial cross sections, and the increase in AT1-R expression in uterine artery endothelium was confirmed by RT/PCR amplification of AT1-R messenger RNA from collagenase dispersed cells (n = 4 pregnant vs. n = 4 nonpregnant, mean 20-fold increase, P < 0.028). We conclude that increased uterine artery endothelial PGI2 responsiveness to AII during pregnancy is indeed associated with a correspondingly marked and localized increase in expression of the endothelial AT1-R receptor. We believe our findings allow a more detailed understanding of the molecular mechanisms that underlie increased uterine blood flow that is so central to the normal development of the growing fetus, and on dysfunction may lead to conditions such as preeclampsia.

Citing Articles

Asymmetric Recruitment of β-Arrestin1/2 by the Angiotensin II Type I and Prostaglandin F2α Receptor Dimer.

Fillion D, Devost D, Sleno R, Inoue A, Hebert T Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019; 10:162.

PMID: 30936850 PMC: 6431625. DOI: 10.3389/fendo.2019.00162.


Placental growth factor blunts uterine artery responses to angiotensin II.

Espinoza J, Betancourt A, Belfort M, Shamshirsaz A, Fox K, Yallampalli C BJOG. 2019; 126(8):1058-1064.

PMID: 30771259 PMC: 7004274. DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.15656.


Conformational biosensors reveal allosteric interactions between heterodimeric AT1 angiotensin and prostaglandin F2α receptors.

Sleno R, Devost D, Petrin D, Zhang A, Bourque K, Shinjo Y J Biol Chem. 2017; 292(29):12139-12152.

PMID: 28584054 PMC: 5519365. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.M117.793877.


Uterine artery leptin receptors during the ovarian cycle and pregnancy regulate angiogenesis in ovine uterine artery endothelial cells†.

Vargas V, Landeros R, Lopez G, Zheng J, Magness R Biol Reprod. 2017; 96(4):866-876.

PMID: 28339937 PMC: 5819836. DOI: 10.1093/biolre/iox008.


Establishment of the Human Uteroplacental Circulation: A Historical Perspective.

Degner K, Magness R, Shah D Reprod Sci. 2016; 24(5):753-761.

PMID: 27733657 PMC: 5933180. DOI: 10.1177/1933719116669056.