Users As Designers: How People Cope with Poor HCI Design in Computer-based Medical Devices
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
In this paper we examine how users interact with a computer-based infusion device adapted for terbutaline infusion to treat preterm labor in women experiencing high-risk pregnancies. This study examines (a) the human-computer interaction (HCI) deficiencies in the device as related to this context of use, (b) how the device characteristics increase the potential for error, and (c) the tailoring strategies developed by users to insulate themselves from failure. Interviews with nurses and tests of the behavior of the infusion device in different conditions identified several classic HCI deficiencies: complex and arbitrary sequences of operation, mode errors caused by poor differentiation of multiple operating modes intended for different contexts, ambiguous alarms, getting lost in multiple displays, and poor feedback on device state and behavior.
Multiple Intravenous Infusions Phase 2b: Laboratory Study.
Pinkney S, Fan M, Chan K, Koczmara C, Colvin C, Sasangohar F Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2015; 14(5):1-163.
PMID: 26316919 PMC: 4549602.
Nurses' workarounds in acute healthcare settings: a scoping review.
Debono D, Greenfield D, Travaglia J, Long J, Black D, Johnson J BMC Health Serv Res. 2013; 13:175.
PMID: 23663305 PMC: 3663687. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-13-175.
Can prospective usability evaluation predict data errors?.
Johnson C, Nahm M, Shaw R, Dunham A, Newby K, Dolor R AMIA Annu Symp Proc. 2011; 2010:346-50.
PMID: 21346998 PMC: 3041437.
Evaluation of the user-friendliness of seven new generation intensive care ventilators.
Vignaux L, Tassaux D, Jolliet P Intensive Care Med. 2009; 35(10):1687-91.
PMID: 19639302 DOI: 10.1007/s00134-009-1580-7.
A usability evaluation of four commercial dental computer-based patient record systems.
Thyvalikakath T, Monaco V, Thambuganipalle H, Schleyer T J Am Dent Assoc. 2008; 139(12):1632-42.
PMID: 19047669 PMC: 2614265. DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2008.0105.