» Articles » PMID: 8965260

Discrimination of Phase Spectra in Complex Sounds by the Bullfrog (Rana Catesbeiana)

Overview
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 8965260
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. Male bullfrogs at two different natural calling sites were presented with playbacks of synthetic advertisement calls differing in phase spectra. Sounds were presented in a ABA design to analyze the ability of the animals to perceive changes in repeated series of stimuli. 2. The number of individual croaks in an answering call significantly increased over repeated presentations of two of the three stimulus phase types in condition A1. There were significantly fewer croaks to the third stimulus. These data suggest that two stimuli were perceived in a similar manner. 3. Latency of calling to stimuli presented in conditions A and B changed in response to shifts in phase spectrum at a low density calling site. These differences were significant when comparing latency to playbacks where shifts in the phase spectrum changed the temporal fine-structure and waveform periodicity of the stimulus. 4. The increase in number of croaks and decrease in response latency across condition A1 and the increase in latency in condition B suggest that discrimination may take the form of stimulus-specific sensitization. In this context, sensitization might reflect an increase in arousal due to repeated presentation of a salient stimulus. 4. The operation of a hypothetical 'mating call detector', based on linear summation of temporal responses from the eighth nerve, provides output similar to the behavioral results.

Citing Articles

Sex differences and endocrine regulation of auditory-evoked, neural responses in African clawed frogs (Xenopus).

Hall I, Woolley S, Kwong-Brown U, Kelley D J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2015; 202(1):17-34.

PMID: 26572136 PMC: 4699871. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-015-1049-9.


"To ear is human, to frogive is divine": Bob Capranica's legacy to auditory neuroethology.

Simmons A J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2012; 199(3):169-82.

PMID: 23239174 DOI: 10.1007/s00359-012-0786-2.


Bats and frogs and animals in between: evidence for a common central timing mechanism to extract periodicity pitch.

Simmons J, Simmons A J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2010; 197(5):585-94.

PMID: 21072522 PMC: 3257830. DOI: 10.1007/s00359-010-0607-4.


Spectral preferences and the role of spatial coherence in simultaneous integration in gray treefrogs (Hyla chrysoscelis).

Bee M J Comp Psychol. 2010; 124(4):412-24.

PMID: 20853948 PMC: 2991503. DOI: 10.1037/a0020307.


Information theory analysis of patterns of modulation in the advertisement call of the male bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana.

Suggs D, Simmons A J Acoust Soc Am. 2005; 117(4 Pt 1):2330-7.

PMID: 15898673 PMC: 1249523. DOI: 10.1121/1.1863693.

References
1.
Buunen T, Festen J, Bilsen F, van den Brink G . Phase effects in a three-component signal. J Acoust Soc Am. 1974; 55(2):297-303. DOI: 10.1121/1.1914501. View

2.
Simmons A, Reese G, Ferragamo M . Periodicity extraction in the anuran auditory nerve. II: Phase and temporal fine structure. J Acoust Soc Am. 1993; 93(6):3374-89. DOI: 10.1121/1.405693. View

3.
Bodnar D, Capranica R . Encoding of phase spectra by the peripheral auditory system of the bullfrog. J Comp Physiol A. 1994; 174(2):157-71. DOI: 10.1007/BF00193783. View

4.
. Behavioral vocal response thresholds to mating calls in the bullfrog, Rana catesbeiana. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984; 76(3):676-81. DOI: 10.1121/1.391254. View

5.
Schwartz J, Simmons A . Encoding of a spectrally-complex communication sound in the bullfrog's auditory nerve. J Comp Physiol A. 1990; 166(4):489-99. DOI: 10.1007/BF00192019. View