» Articles » PMID: 8957544

Role of G-proteins in Altered Beta-adrenergic Responsiveness in the Failing and Hypertrophied Myocardium

Overview
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 8957544
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the heart and other tissues, beta-adrenergic desensitization occurs during treatment with catecholamines. In heart failure, a strong sympathetic activation has been observed and is the cause of beta-adrenergic desensitization in this condition. On the receptor level, there is a downregulation of beta 1-adrenergic receptors as well as an uncoupling of beta 2-adrenoceptors. The latter mechanism has been related to an increased activity and gene expression of beta-ARK2 in failing myocardium leading to phosphorylation and uncoupling of receptors. In addition, an increase of inhibitory G-protein alpha-subunits (Gi alpha) has been suggested to be causally linked to adenylyl cyclase desensitization in heart failure. In contrast, the catalytic subunit of adenylyl cyclase, stimulatory G-protein alpha-subunits and beta gamma-subunits have been observed to be unchanged. Recently, evidence has been raised that increases of Gi alpha also depress adenylyl cyclase in compensated cardiac hypertrophy in monogenic and polygenic as well as in secondary hypertension. These increases of Gi alpha can suppress adenylyl cyclase in the absence of beta-adrenergic receptor downregulation. Since cardiac hypertrophy in pressure overload is a strong predictor of cardiac failure these observations indicate that adenylyl cyclase desensitization by Gi alpha could be a pathophysiologically relevant mechanism to contribute to the progression from compensated cardiac hypertrophy to heart failure.

Citing Articles

Ubrogepant, erenumab, and eptinezumab antagonize positive inotropic effects of the calcitonin gene-related peptide in the isolated human atrium.

Neumann J, Hofmann B, Gergs U Naunyn Schmiedebergs Arch Pharmacol. 2025; .

PMID: 40085216 DOI: 10.1007/s00210-025-04029-7.


Sympatho-adrenergic mechanisms in heart failure: new insights into pathophysiology.

Du X Med Rev (2021). 2023; 1(1):47-77.

PMID: 37724075 PMC: 10388789. DOI: 10.1515/mr-2021-0007.


Impact of Aldosterone on the Failing Myocardium: Insights from Mitochondria and Adrenergic Receptors Signaling and Function.

Guitart-Mampel M, Urquiza P, Borges J, Lymperopoulos A, Solesio M Cells. 2021; 10(6).

PMID: 34205363 PMC: 8235589. DOI: 10.3390/cells10061552.


Gender and tachycardia: independent modulation of platelet reactivity in patients with atrial fibrillation.

Procter N, Ball J, Ngo D, Isenberg J, Hylek E, Chirkov Y J Geriatr Cardiol. 2016; 13(3):202-8.

PMID: 27103914 PMC: 4826889. DOI: 10.11909/j.issn.1671-5411.2016.03.005.


Decreased beta-adrenergic responsiveness following hypertrophy occurs only in cardiomyocytes that also re-express beta-myosin heavy chain.

Pandya K, Porter K, Rockman H, Smithies O Eur J Heart Fail. 2009; 11(7):648-52.

PMID: 19553396 PMC: 2701279. DOI: 10.1093/eurjhf/hfp073.


References
1.
Murakami T, Katada T, Yasuda H . Reduction in the activity of the stimulatory guanine nucleotide-binding protein in the myocardium of spontaneously hypertensive rats. J Mol Cell Cardiol. 1987; 19(2):199-208. DOI: 10.1016/s0022-2828(87)80562-x. View

2.
Cohn J . The sympathetic nervous system in heart failure. J Cardiovasc Pharmacol. 1989; 14 Suppl 5:S57-61. View

3.
Bohm M, Kirchmayr R, Gierschik P, Erdmann E . Increase of myocardial inhibitory G-proteins in catecholamine-refractory septic shock or in septic multiorgan failure. Am J Med. 1995; 98(2):183-6. DOI: 10.1016/S0002-9343(99)80402-1. View

4.
Swedberg K, Viquerat C, Rouleau J, Roizen M, Atherton B, Parmley W . Comparison of myocardial catecholamine balance in chronic congestive heart failure and in angina pectoris without failure. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 54(7):783-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0002-9149(84)80208-8. View

5.
Ayobe M, TARAZI R . Reversal of changes in myocardial beta-receptors and inotropic responsiveness with regression of cardiac hypertrophy in renal hypertensive rats (RHR). Circ Res. 1984; 54(2):125-34. DOI: 10.1161/01.res.54.2.125. View