» Articles » PMID: 8950835

The Pharmacokinetics of Ceftazidime in Lactating and Non-lactating Cows

Overview
Journal Vet Res Commun
Publisher Springer
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 8950835
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime (CAZ) were studied in lactating (LTG) and non-lactating (NLTG) cows. Two groups (LTG and NLTG) of 5 healthy dairy cows were given ceftazidime (10 mg/ kg body weight) intravenously (i.v.) and intramuscularly (i.m.). Serum and milk (LTG) and serum samples (NLTG) were collected over a 24-h period post-administration. CAZ concentrations in serum and milk were determined by high-performance liquid chromatography, and an interactive and weighted-non-linear least-squares regression analysis was used to perform the pharmacokinetic analysis. The pharmacokinetic profiles in LTG and NLTG cows which had received CAZ i.v. fitted a three-compartment model and a two-compartment model, respectively. The CAZ concentration-time curves in serum and the area under the curve were greater and more sustained (p < 0.05) in the LTG cows by both routes, while the serum clearance (Cls = 72.5 +/- 18.1 ml/h per kg) was lower (p < 0.05) than that in the NLTG cows (Cls = 185.9 +/- 44.2 ml/h per kg). CAZ given i.v. exhibited a relatively long half-life of elimination (t1/2 beta (LTG) = 1.1 +/- 0.2 h; t1/2 beta (NLTG) = 1.4 +/- 0.3 h). Compared with other cephalosporins, CAZ had good penetration into the mammary gland (47.7 +/- 38.2% for CAZ i.v.; 51.1 +/- 39.0% for CAZ i.m.). Finally, the bioavailability of CAZ (F(LTG) = 98.9 +/- 36.8%; F(NLTG) = 77.1 +/- 25.3%) was suitable for its used by the i.m. route in lactating and non-lactating cows.

Citing Articles

Modelling concentrations of antimicrobial drugs: comparative pharmacokinetics of cephalosporin antimicrobials and accuracy of allometric scaling in food-producing and companion animals.

Taverne F, van Geijlswijk I, Heederik D, Wagenaar J, Mouton J BMC Vet Res. 2016; 12(1):185.

PMID: 27596044 PMC: 5011836. DOI: 10.1186/s12917-016-0817-2.


Disposition kinetics and urinary excretion of cefpirome after intravenous injection in buffalo calves.

Rajput N, Dumka V, Sandhu H J Vet Sci. 2007; 8(1):21-5.

PMID: 17322770 PMC: 2872693. DOI: 10.4142/jvs.2007.8.1.21.

References
1.
Harding S, Monro A, Thornton J, Ayrton J, Hogg M . The comparative pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime and cefotaxime in healthy volunteers. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009; 8 Suppl B:263-72. DOI: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.263. View

2.
Walstad R, Hellum K, Blika S, Dale L, Fredriksen T, Myhre K . Pharmacokinetics and tissue penetration of ceftazidime: studies on lymph, aqueous humour, skin blister, cerebrospinal and pleural fluid. J Antimicrob Chemother. 1983; 12 Suppl A:275-82. DOI: 10.1093/jac/12.suppl_a.275. View

3.
Capel-Edwards K, Pratt D . Renal tolerance of ceftazidime in animals. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2009; 8 Suppl B:241-5. DOI: 10.1093/jac/8.suppl_b.241. View

4.
Rule R, Rubio M, Perelli M . Pharmacokinetics of ceftazidime in sheep and its penetration into tissue and peritoneal fluids. Res Vet Sci. 1991; 51(3):233-8. DOI: 10.1016/0034-5288(91)90069-z. View

5.
Balant L, Dayer P, Auckenthaler R . Clinical pharmacokinetics of the third generation cephalosporins. Clin Pharmacokinet. 1985; 10(2):101-43. DOI: 10.2165/00003088-198510020-00001. View