» Articles » PMID: 8927277

[Vaginal and Abdominal Hysterectomy: Comparison and Perspectives. Apropos of 385 Consecutive Cases]

Overview
Journal Minerva Ginecol
Date 1996 May 1
PMID 8927277
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Hysterectomy is the most common non-pregnancy related surgical procedure. However, given the lack of final guidelines on indications, alternative therapies, surgical approach and outcomes, it is desirable to keep its use under constant monitoring. We reviewed 385 hysterectomies for benign conditions-divided according to surgical approach-performed in the Gynaecological Department of San Daniele del Friuli (Udine-Italy) in 1991-1993, and with one-year follow-up. Traditional approaches, i.e. abdominal (39.2%) and vaginal (60.2%), were used. Colporraphy was performed in 79 cases (33.8% of vaginal hysterectomies); 73.4% of colporraphies were followed by urethral suspension. We reviewed population's patterns, indications and surgical outcomes according to Dicker's suggestions. Vaginal hysterectomy with associated colporraphy concerned a population of patients with average age and parity significantly different from patients who underwent simple vaginal or abdominal hysterectomy. These last two groups, on the other hand, have similar characteristics making them comparable. In abdominal hysterectomy and simple vaginal hysterectomy we reported a complication rate respectively of 21.9% and 7.1%. The advantages of simple vaginal hysterectomy include shorter operating time, reduction in antibiotic drugs usage, earlier hospital discharge and quicker recovery, with obvious cost saving. Our experience therefore supports the view that the balance between abdominal and vaginal hysterectomy could safely be shifted in favour of the last one, the advantages of which could then be made available to a larger number of patients.

Citing Articles

Laparoscopic colon and rectal resections with intracorporeal anastomosis and trans-vaginal specimen extraction for colorectal cancer. A case series and systematic literature review.

Stipa F, Burza A, Curinga R, Santini E, Delle Site P, Avantifiori R Int J Colorectal Dis. 2015; 30(7):955-62.

PMID: 25749939 DOI: 10.1007/s00384-015-2178-x.


Transvaginal specimen extraction versus conventional minilaparotomy after laparoscopic anterior resection for colorectal cancer: mid-term results of a case-matched study.

Kim H, Choi G, Park J, Park S, Ryuk J, Hwan Yoon S Surg Endosc. 2014; 28(8):2342-8.

PMID: 24566749 DOI: 10.1007/s00464-014-3466-1.


Transvaginal specimen extraction after laparoscopic colectomy.

Torres R, Orban R, Tocaimaza L, Vallejos Pereira G, Arevalo J World J Surg. 2012; 36(7):1699-702.

PMID: 22374544 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-012-1528-x.


Transvaginal specimen extraction in a laparoscopic anterior resection of a sigmoid colon neoplasia with en bloc right salpingo-oophorectomy.

Florez L, Arguelles J, Quijada B, Alvarez V, Galarraga M, Grana J Tech Coloproctol. 2010; 14(2):161-3.

PMID: 20135188 DOI: 10.1007/s10151-009-0561-8.