» Articles » PMID: 8919602

Coprescription of Terfenadine and Erythromycin or Ketaconazole: an Assessment of Potential Harm

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1996 Apr 1
PMID 8919602
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: In a retrospective study, the authors used a pharmacy claims database to analyze the rate of coprescription of terfenadine and erythromycin or ketaconazole.

Study Period: The investigators reviewed claims filed for these drugs between January 1, 1990, and June 30, 1993. The time period allowed for comparison of coprescription rates before and after the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) required the manufacturer of terfenadine to inform the medical community of potentially serious adverse interactions.

Results: There were 5,802 coprescription events for terfenadine and erythromycin and 150 coprescription events for terfenadine and ketaconazole. Rates per 100,000 terfenadine users demonstrated large declines about 18 months after initial regulatory action. Coprescription events of terfenadine with either erythromycin or ketaconazole continued to occur despite regulatory action.

Conclusions: Results of this study suggest important roles for the pharmacist as a risk manager, disseminating information about newly published drug interactions. Both health providers and patients are audiences for the pharmacist's drug expertise. The delay in physician reaction to new information from pharmaceutical companies and the federal government suggests an early, strong role for the pharmacist in changing prescribing behavior.

Citing Articles

Measuring the impact of medicines regulatory interventions - Systematic review and methodological considerations.

Goedecke T, Morales D, Pacurariu A, Kurz X Br J Clin Pharmacol. 2017; 84(3):419-433.

PMID: 29105853 PMC: 5809349. DOI: 10.1111/bcp.13469.


Impact of safety-related regulatory action on clinical practice: a systematic review.

Piening S, Haaijer-Ruskamp F, de Vries J, van der Elst M, de Graeff P, Straus S Drug Saf. 2012; 35(5):373-85.

PMID: 22480319 DOI: 10.2165/11599100-000000000-00000.


Impact of FDA drug risk communications on health care utilization and health behaviors: a systematic review.

Dusetzina S, Higashi A, Ray Dorsey E, Conti R, Huskamp H, Zhu S Med Care. 2012; 50(6):466-78.

PMID: 22266704 PMC: 3342472. DOI: 10.1097/MLR.0b013e318245a160.


Relevance of a "Dear Doctor letter" to alert healthcare providers to new recommendations for vitamin D administration.

Theophile H, Miremont-Salame G, Robinson P, Moore N, Begaud B, Haramburu F Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 2011; 67(7):681-6.

PMID: 21597972 DOI: 10.1007/s00228-011-1055-y.


Pharmacogenetic issues in thorough QT trials.

Judson R, Salisbury B, Reed C, Ackerman M Mol Diagn Ther. 2006; 10(3):153-62.

PMID: 16771601 DOI: 10.1007/BF03256454.