Nasopharyngoscopic Evaluation and Cephalometric Analysis of Velopharynx in Normal and Cleft Palate Patients
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
The velopharyngeal dimensions and velopharyngeal functions of 58 patients having a cleft lip and palate were compared with those of 30 normal noncleft subjects. The patient group received perceptual speech assessment, nasopharyngoscopic examination, and lateral cephalogram, and was classified accordingly into three categories: velopharyngeal competency, borderline velopharyngeal competency, and velopharyngeal incompetency. The results indicated that (1) the need ratio differs significantly among the three cleft palate patient groups and (2) when compared to the control group, the velopharyngeal incompetency group has an excessive need ratio, narrower posterior pharyngeal wall, narrower linear dimensions in pharyngeal depth, and shorter velar and hard-palate length. The clinical implication and application of the findings are discussed.
Mason K, Hanson B, Black J Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2024; 12(2):e5617.
PMID: 38375369 PMC: 10876255. DOI: 10.1097/GOX.0000000000005617.
Cephalometric predictors of hypernasality and nasal air emission.
Denegri M, Silva P, Pegoraro-Krook M, Ozawa T, Yaedu R, Dutka J J Appl Oral Sci. 2021; 29:e20210320.
PMID: 34644782 PMC: 8523092. DOI: 10.1590/1678-7757-2021-0320.
Effective Velopharyngeal Ratio: A More Clinically Relevant Measure of Velopharyngeal Function.
Haenssler A, Fang X, Perry J J Speech Lang Hear Res. 2020; 63(11):3586-3593.
PMID: 32976083 PMC: 8582755. DOI: 10.1044/2020_JSLHR-20-00305.
[Effectiveness of Furlow palatoplasty in velopharyngeal insufficiency after cleft palate surgery].
Li F, Chen Y, Wu W, Luo D, Liu J, Hao J Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi. 2019; 33(5):595-600.
PMID: 31090354 PMC: 8337189. DOI: 10.7507/1002-1892.201811043.
Sarmadi S, Chalipa J, Tanbakuchi B, Mahd M, Nasiri M, Mehtari M J Dent (Tehran). 2018; 15(3):161-168.
PMID: 30090116 PMC: 6079186.