» Articles » PMID: 8916824

Recovery of Systolic and Diastolic Left Ventricular Function Early After Cardiopulmonary Bypass

Overview
Journal Anesthesiology
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 1996 Nov 1
PMID 8916824
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Impairment of left ventricular function after cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) is well recognized, but little is known about the time course of recovery of cardiac function early after separation from CPB. Therefore, recovery of left ventricular function was evaluated early after separation from CPB in patients undergoing coronary artery surgery. The authors tried to determine whether this recovery might be attributed to autoregulation of function by preload.

Methods: Left ventricular pressure was measured with fluid-filled catheters. Data were digitally recorded during increased pressure induced by elevating the legs. Transgastric short-axis echocardiographic views of the left ventricle were simultaneously recorded on videotape. Systolic function was evaluated with the slope (Ees, mmHg/ml) of the systolic pressure-volume relation. Diastolic function was evaluated with the chamber stiffness constant (Kc, ml-1) of the diastolic pressure-volume relation. Cardiac function was assessed before CPB, after termination of CPB, and 5, 10, and 15 min later. Two different separation procedures from CPB were compared: in protocol 1, left ventricular function was documented during the standard procedure (n = 24); in protocol 2, the heart was optimally filled 10 min before separation from CPB (n = 12).

Results: In protocol 1, Ees was 2.88 +/- 0.21 mmHg/ml (mean +/- SEM) and Kc was 0.012 +/- 0.001 ml-1 before CPB. Within 10 min after separation from CPB, Ees increased from 1.10 +/- 0.32 to 2.92 +/- 0.34 (P = 0.001) and Kc decreased from 0.022 +/- 0.002 to 0.011 +/- 0.001 (P = 0.001). The parameters remained stable thereafter. In protocol 2, Ees was 2.92 +/- 0.51 mmHg/ ml and Kc was 0.011 +/- 0.002 ml-1 before CPB. Depression of systolic and diastolic function was not observed in these patients. At time 0, Ees was 2.46 +/- 0.16 and Kc was 0.012 +/- 0.002. These values remained stable throughout the entire observation period.

Conclusions: Significant functional recovery was observed early after separation from CPB, which was suggestive of time-dependent changes in both systolic and diastolic left ventricular function induced by preload restoration.

Citing Articles

Corrected right ventricular end-diastolic volume and initial distribution volume of glucose correlate with cardiac output after cardiac surgery.

Saito J, Ishihara H, Hashiba E, Okawa H, Kudo T, Sawada M J Anesth. 2013; 27(4):512-20.

PMID: 23455772 DOI: 10.1007/s00540-013-1558-z.


[Left ventricular diastolic dysfunction. Implications for anesthesia and critical care].

Meierhenrich R, Schutz W, Gauss A Anaesthesist. 2008; 57(11):1053-68.

PMID: 18958434 DOI: 10.1007/s00101-008-1457-0.


Load dependent diastolic dysfunction in heart failure.

Gillebert T, Leite-Moreira A, De Hert S Heart Fail Rev. 2001; 5(4):345-55.

PMID: 11498648 DOI: 10.1023/a:1026563313952.


Regional myocardial mechanics: integrative computational models of flow-function relations.

McCulloch A, Mazhari R J Nucl Cardiol. 2001; 8(4):506-19.

PMID: 11481573 DOI: 10.1067/mnc.2001.117113.