» Articles » PMID: 8916814

Clinical and Bacteriologic Survey of Epidural Analgesia in Patients in the Intensive Care Unit

Overview
Journal Anesthesiology
Specialty Anesthesiology
Date 1996 Nov 1
PMID 8916814
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The risk of bacterial contamination related to epidural analgesia in patients cared for in the intensive care unit has not been assessed. Thus the authors studied patients who received care in the intensive care unit who were given epidural analgesia for more than 48 h to determine the rates of local, epidural catheter, and spinal space infection and to identify risk factors.

Methods: Each patient receiving epidural analgesia for longer than 48 h was examined daily for local and general signs of infection. A swab sample for culture was taken if there was local discharge; all epidural catheters were cultured on withdrawal. All patients underwent weekly neurologic monitoring for 1 month; those with positive epidural catheter cultures had one spinal magnetic resonance image scan.

Results: The 75 patients cared for in the intensive care unit who were studied had been receiving epidural analgesia for a median of 4 days (interquartile range, 3.5 to 5 days). Twenty-seven patients had signs of local inflammation (erythema or local discharge), and nine of these had infections. All the patients who had both local signs also had infection. All nine infections were local (12%), but four patients also had epidural catheter infections (5.3%). No patient with erythema alone or without local signs had a positive epidural catheter culture. No spinal space infection was diagnosed. Staphylococcus epidermidis was the most frequently cultured microorganism. Local infection was treated by removing the epidural catheter without any antibiotics. Concomitant infection at other sites (21 of 75 patients, or 28%), antibiotic therapy (64 of 75 patients, or 85%), the duration of epidural analgesia, and the insertion site level of the epidural catheter were not identified as risk factors for epidural analgesia-related infections.

Conclusions: The risk of epidural analgesia-related infection in patients in the intensive care unit seems to be low. The presence of two local signs of inflammation is a strong predictor of local and epidural catheter infection.

Citing Articles

Postoperative Thoracic Epidural Analgesia: Adverse Events from a Single-Center Series of 3126 Patients.

Manassero A, Bossolasco M, Carrega M, Coletta G Local Reg Anesth. 2020; 13:111-119.

PMID: 32982397 PMC: 7490049. DOI: 10.2147/LRA.S272410.


[SBA 2020: Regional anesthesia safety recommendations update].

Azi L, Fonseca N, Linard L Braz J Anesthesiol. 2020; 70(4):398-418.

PMID: 32636024 PMC: 9373527. DOI: 10.1016/j.bjan.2020.02.005.


Microbiological and scanning electron microscopic evaluation of epidural catheters.

van Samkar G, Balraadjsing P, Hermanns H, Hoogendijk I, Hollmann M, Zaat S Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2020; 45(5):381-385.

PMID: 32179623 PMC: 8408583. DOI: 10.1136/rapm-2019-101180.


Comparison of analgesic efficacy and safety of continuous epidural infusion versus local infiltration and systemic opioids in video-assisted thoracoscopic surgery decortication in pediatric empyema patients.

Karnik P, Dave N, Garasia M Saudi J Anaesth. 2018; 12(2):240-244.

PMID: 29628834 PMC: 5875212. DOI: 10.4103/sja.SJA_659_17.


Caudal anesthesia in a patient with peritonitis: Is it safe??.

Kako H, Hakim M, Kundu A, Tobias T Saudi J Anaesth. 2016; 10(2):228-32.

PMID: 27051378 PMC: 4799619. DOI: 10.4103/1658-354X.168826.