Peer Review of Grant Applications: a Harbinger for Mediocrity in Clinical Research?
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
An efficient system to fund science: from proposal review to peer-to-peer distributions.
Bollen J, Crandall D, Junk D, Ding Y, Borner K Scientometrics. 2018; 110(1):521-528.
PMID: 29795961 PMC: 5963719. DOI: 10.1007/s11192-016-2110-3.
A Discussion on Governmental Research Grants.
Fang H Sci Eng Ethics. 2014; 21(5):1285-96.
PMID: 25143309 DOI: 10.1007/s11948-014-9582-4.
Research grants: Conform and be funded.
Nicholson J, Ioannidis J Nature. 2012; 492(7427):34-6.
PMID: 23222591 DOI: 10.1038/492034a.
Is peer review useful in assessing research proposals in Indigenous health? A case study.
Street J, Baum F, Anderson I Health Res Policy Syst. 2009; 7:2.
PMID: 19216770 PMC: 2654449. DOI: 10.1186/1478-4505-7-2.
Peer review for improving the quality of grant applications.
Demicheli V, Di Pietrantonj C Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2007; (2):MR000003.
PMID: 17443627 PMC: 8973940. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.MR000003.pub2.