» Articles » PMID: 8906525

Structure and Function of Resistance Arteries of Hypertensive Patients Treated with a Beta-blocker or a Calcium Channel Antagonist

Overview
Journal J Hypertens
Date 1996 Oct 1
PMID 8906525
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate the effects on resistance artery structure and function of monotherapy with the beta-blocker atenolol or the calcium channel antagonist nifedipine in its once a day form or gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS).

Subjects: Twenty well-controlled essential hypertensive patients matched for age, body mass index, duration and severity of hypertension. Normotensive subjects and untreated hypertensives served as the reference groups.

Methods: Resistance-size small arteries (standardized lumen diameter 247 +/- 8 microns) were dissected from a gluteal subcutaneous biopsy, and studied both on a wire myograph as pressurized vessels.

Results: The media width:lumen diameter ratio of arteries was 5.37 +/- 0.09% in normotensive subjects, 5.38 +/- 0.18% in patients treated with nifedipine GITS, 6.81 +/- 0.18% in patients treated with atenolol and 7.08 +/- 0.12% in untreated hypertensives (for each of the latter two groups P < 0.001, versus each of the two former groups). The media stress developed in response to noradrenaline and the endothelium-dependent relaxation induced by acetylcholine were significantly smaller in small arteries from untreated or atenolol-treated patients than they were in those from normotensive subjects or nifedipine GITS-treated patients.

Conclusion: Hypertensive patients with well-controlled blood pressures under treatment for more than 1 year with the once-a-day calcium channel antagonist nifedipine GITS exhibit normal structure and function of gluteal subcutaneous small arteries, whereas similar patients with blood pressure equally well controlled by the beta-blocker atenolol present thicker small arteries with abnormal endothelium-dependent relaxation and altered contractility. Whether this finding applies also to other vascular beds, and whether it is associated with a better outcome in relation to morbidity and mortality resulting from elevated blood pressure, remain to be established.

Citing Articles

Systemic and Cardiac Microvascular Dysfunction in Hypertension.

Durante A, Mazzapicchi A, Baiardo Redaelli M Int J Mol Sci. 2025; 25(24.

PMID: 39769057 PMC: 11677602. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252413294.


Cardiovascular risk in patients receiving antihypertensive drug treatment from the perspective of endothelial function.

Maruhashi T, Higashi Y Hypertens Res. 2022; 45(8):1322-1333.

PMID: 35595983 DOI: 10.1038/s41440-022-00936-x.


Mechanobiology of Microvascular Function and Structure in Health and Disease: Focus on the Coronary Circulation.

Brandt M, Cheng C, Merkus D, Duncker D, Sorop O Front Physiol. 2022; 12:771960.

PMID: 35002759 PMC: 8733629. DOI: 10.3389/fphys.2021.771960.


Assessment and pathophysiology of microvascular disease: recent progress and clinical implications.

Masi S, Rizzoni D, Taddei S, Widmer R, Montezano A, Luscher T Eur Heart J. 2020; 42(26):2590-2604.

PMID: 33257973 PMC: 8266605. DOI: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehaa857.


The Complex Relationship Between Serum Uric Acid, Endothelial Function and Small Vessel Remodeling in Humans.

Masi S, Georgiopoulos G, Alexopoulos G, Pateras K, Rosada J, Seravalle G J Clin Med. 2020; 9(7).

PMID: 32605201 PMC: 7409082. DOI: 10.3390/jcm9072027.