Developmental Dyslexia: Passive Visual Stimulation Provides No Evidence for a Magnocellular Processing Defect
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Livingstone et al. [Livingstone, M. S., Rosen, G. D., Drislane, F. W. and Galaburda, A. M. Physiological and anatomical evidence for a magnocellular defect in developmental dyslexia. Proceedings of the National Academy of Science U.S.A. 88, 7943-7947, 1991] presented evidence for a defect of the magnocellular visual processing stream in developmental dyslexia. We attempted to replicate this effect using transient and steady-state VEPs to checkerboard reversal stimuli in a group of adult developmental dyslexics. Several different reversal rates and contract levels were utilized. No differences were found between the dyslexic and control groups for the low-contrast, rapidly reversing patterns, nor for any combination of stimulus rate or contrast that was tested. Thus, these findings do not support a magnocellular processing deficit in developmental dyslexia.
Flicker fusion thresholds as a clinical identifier of a magnocellular-deficit dyslexic subgroup.
Peters J, Bavin E, Brown A, Crewther D, Crewther S Sci Rep. 2020; 10(1):21638.
PMID: 33303835 PMC: 7730401. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-020-78552-3.
Ronconi L, Melcher D, Franchin L Psychon Bull Rev. 2020; 27(4):724-734.
PMID: 32495210 DOI: 10.3758/s13423-020-01752-5.
Pattern Visual Evoked Potentials in Dyslexic Children.
Heravian Shandiz J, Heyrani M, Sobhani-Rad D, Salehinejad Z, Shojaei S, Khoshsima M J Ophthalmic Vis Res. 2017; 12(4):402-406.
PMID: 29090050 PMC: 5644407. DOI: 10.4103/jovr.jovr_106_16.
Problems with visual statistical learning in developmental dyslexia.
Sigurdardottir H, Danielsdottir H, Gudmundsdottir M, Hjartarson K, Thorarinsdottir E, Kristjansson A Sci Rep. 2017; 7(1):606.
PMID: 28377626 PMC: 5428689. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-017-00554-5.
Gori S, Molteni M, Facoetti A Front Hum Neurosci. 2016; 10:175.
PMID: 27199702 PMC: 4842763. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2016.00175.