» Articles » PMID: 8887038

Effects of High-dose Intraperitoneal Aprotinin Treatment on Complement Activation and Acute Phase Response in Acute Severe Pancreatitis

Overview
Journal J Gastroenterol
Specialty Gastroenterology
Date 1996 Oct 1
PMID 8887038
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Forty-eight patients with severe acute pancreatitis were treated with intraperitoneal lavage in a double-blind randomized multi-center trial. One group (aprotinin group, n = 22) was also treated intraperitoneally with high doses of the protease inhibitor aprotinin. In the group not treated with aprotinin (control group), 6 patients were operated on because of pancreatic necrosis, compared with none in the treated group. Complement activation and the acute phase response were studied with measurements of anaphylatoxin C3a, C1 inhibitor (C1 Inh), interleukin 6 (IL-6), and C-reactive protein (CRP). The control group had higher plasma levels of C3a and lower levels of C1 Inh compared with the aprotinin group. The differences were statistically significant for C3a but not for C1 Inh. Both groups had high plasma levels of IL-6 and CRP. There were no differences between the groups in CRP levels, but the control group had higher IL-6 levels (not statistically significant) than the aprotinin group. This was caused by very high levels in the 6 patients operated on because of pancreatic necrosis, indicating that IL-6 could be a good plasma marker of pancreatic necrosis. The results also show that massive antiprotease treatment reduces complement activation, as illustrated by the lower C3a levels in the aprotinin group. The lower C1 Inh levels in the control group could have been caused by an increased consumption of the inhibitor.

Citing Articles

Pharmacological interventions for acute pancreatitis.

Moggia E, Koti R, Belgaumkar A, Fazio F, Pereira S, Davidson B Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017; 4:CD011384.

PMID: 28431202 PMC: 6478067. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD011384.pub2.


Divergent Inhibitor Susceptibility among Airway Lumen-Accessible Tryptic Proteases.

Nimishakavi S, Raymond W, Gruenert D, Caughey G PLoS One. 2015; 10(10):e0141169.

PMID: 26485396 PMC: 4612780. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0141169.


Pharmacologic therapy for acute pancreatitis.

Kambhampati S, Park W, Habtezion A World J Gastroenterol. 2014; 20(45):16868-80.

PMID: 25493000 PMC: 4258556. DOI: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i45.16868.


Peritoneal lavage for severe acute pancreatitis: a systematic review of randomised trials.

Dong Z, Petrov M, Xu J, Shanbhag S, Windsor J, Pang S World J Surg. 2010; 34(9):2103-8.

PMID: 20532765 DOI: 10.1007/s00268-010-0665-3.

References
1.
Heath D, Cruickshank A, Gudgeon A, Jehanli A, Shenkin A, Imrie C . The relationship between pancreatic enzyme release and activation and the acute-phase protein response in patients with acute pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1995; 10(4):347-53. DOI: 10.1097/00006676-199505000-00005. View

2.
Schroder T, Kivilaakso E, Kinnunen P, Lempinen M . Serum phospholipase A2 in human acute pancreatitis. Scand J Gastroenterol. 1980; 15(5):633-6. DOI: 10.3109/00365528009182227. View

3.
Balthazar E, Robinson D, Megibow A, Ranson J . Acute pancreatitis: value of CT in establishing prognosis. Radiology. 1990; 174(2):331-6. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.2.2296641. View

4.
Heath D, Cruickshank A, Gudgeon M, Jehanli A, Shenkin A, Imrie C . Role of interleukin-6 in mediating the acute phase protein response and potential as an early means of severity assessment in acute pancreatitis. Gut. 1993; 34(1):41-5. PMC: 1374098. DOI: 10.1136/gut.34.1.41. View

5.
Yamaguchi H, Kimura T, Mimura K, Nawata H . Activation of proteases in cerulein-induced pancreatitis. Pancreas. 1989; 4(5):565-71. DOI: 10.1097/00006676-198910000-00007. View