» Articles » PMID: 885832

The Influence of Behavior Preceding a Reinforced Response on Behavior Change in the Classroom

Overview
Specialty Social Sciences
Date 1977 Jan 1
PMID 885832
Citations 7
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The influence of behavior that immediately precedes a reinforced target response on the effectiveness of a reinforcement contingency was examined in two experiments with mentally retarded children in a special-education classroom. Two reinforcement schedules were examined in each experiment. For each schedule, a prespecified period of attentive behavior served as the target response. The schedules differed in whether inattentive or attentive behavior was required immediately to precede the target response. These schedules were examined with one child in a simultaneous treatment design using praise as the reinforcer (Experiment I), and with two children in separate reversal designs using tokens as the reinforcer (Experiment II). While attentive behavior increased under each schedule, the increase was greater when attentive rather than inattentive behavior preceded the reinforced response. The results indicated that the effect of a contingency may be determined not only by the specific response reinforced but also by the behavior that immediately precedes that response.

Citing Articles

Operant conditioning of autogrooming in vervet monkeys: Cercopithecus aethiops.

Iversen I, Ragnarsdottir G, Randrup K J Exp Anal Behav. 1984; 42(2):171-89.

PMID: 16812384 PMC: 1348076. DOI: 10.1901/jeab.1984.42-171.


Analyzing alertness among people with profound multiple disabilities: implications for provision of training.

Green C, GARDNER S, Canipe V, Reid D J Appl Behav Anal. 1994; 27(3):519-31.

PMID: 7928793 PMC: 1297832. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1994.27-519.


Direct versus indirect response-reinforcer relationships in teaching autistic children.

Koegel R, Williams J J Abnorm Child Psychol. 1980; 8(4):537-47.

PMID: 7462531 DOI: 10.1007/BF00916505.


Response-reinforcer relationships and improved learning in autistic children.

Williams J, Koegel R, Egel A J Appl Behav Anal. 1981; 14(1):53-60.

PMID: 7216932 PMC: 1308185. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1981.14-53.


The integrity of independent variables in behavior analysis.

Peterson L, Homer A, Wonderlich S J Appl Behav Anal. 1982; 15(4):477-92.

PMID: 7153187 PMC: 1308296. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1982.15-477.


References
1.
Kazdin A . Role of instructions and reinforcement in behavior changes in token reinforcement programs. J Educ Psychol. 1973; 64(1):63-71. DOI: 10.1037/h0034073. View

2.
Hall R, Lund D, Jackson D . Effects of teacher attention on study behavior. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968; 1(1):1-12. PMC: 1310970. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-1. View

3.
Kazdin A . Methodological and assessment considerations in evaluating reinforcement programs in applied settings. J Appl Behav Anal. 1973; 6(3):517-31. PMC: 1310866. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1973.6-517. View

4.
Schmidt G, Ulrich R . Effects of group contingent events upon classroom noise. J Appl Behav Anal. 1969; 2(3):171-9. PMC: 1311060. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1969.2-171. View

5.
Madsen C, Becker W, Thomas D . Rules, praise, and ignoring: elements of elementary classroom control. J Appl Behav Anal. 1968; 1(2):139-50. PMC: 1310990. DOI: 10.1901/jaba.1968.1-139. View