» Articles » PMID: 8854262

Experience and Design Recommendations for Picture Archiving and Communication Systems in the Surgical Setting

Overview
Journal J Digit Imaging
Publisher Springer
Date 1996 Aug 1
PMID 8854262
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

An analysis of the efficacy of a picture archiving and communication system (PACS) in the surgical domain was undertaken at the Baltimore Veterans Affairs Medical Center. Interviews with surgeons and staff were conducted and supplemented by direct radiologist observation in the operating room (OR) and surgical outpatient clinic to determine patterns of routine clinical PACS use, levels of satisfaction both within and outside of the OR, and perceptions of the relative efficacy of the system in comparison to film. These data as well as suggestions from the surgical staff members were used to make recommendations for specific modifications in PACS design and operation to improve the current system and to help prescribe design improvements for future PAC systems. A high level of satisfaction with the system was found and the use of PACS was favored over film by a majority of surgeons and their staff. Findings of this study suggest that the design of a hospital-wide PAC system must have the flexibility to accommodate the specific requirements of a wide variety of end-users in their unique hospital environments.

Citing Articles

Technologies for image distribution in hospitals.

Kotter E, Baumann T, Jager D, Langer M Eur Radiol. 2006; 16(6):1270-9.

PMID: 16534601 DOI: 10.1007/s00330-006-0153-1.


Clinical input into designing a PACS.

Yousem D, Beauchamp Jr N J Digit Imaging. 2000; 13(1):19-24.

PMID: 10696597 PMC: 3453428. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168336.


A digital imaging and communications in medicine (DICOM) print service for chest imaging.

Tucker D, Suitor C, Shepard S, Schomer D J Digit Imaging. 1997; 10(3):120-5.

PMID: 9268907 PMC: 3452948. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168599.

References
1.
Horii S . Electronic imaging workstations: ergonomic issues and the user interface. Radiographics. 1992; 12(4):773-87. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.12.4.1636039. View

2.
Gur D, Fuhrman C, Thaete F . Requirements for PACS: users' perspective. Radiographics. 1993; 13(2):457-60. DOI: 10.1148/radiographics.13.2.8460230. View

3.
Kuroda C, Yoshioka H, Kadota T, Narumi Y, Okamoto H, Kumatani T . Small PACS for digital medical images--reliability and security in a clinical setting. Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 1994; 43(1-2):101-6. DOI: 10.1016/0169-2607(94)90194-5. View

4.
Siegel E, Diaconis J, Pomerantz S, Allman R, Briscoe B . Making filmless radiology work. J Digit Imaging. 1995; 8(4):151-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF03168713. View

5.
Siegel E . Hospital takes plunge into full-fledged PACS. Diagn Imaging (San Franc). 1993; 15(2):69-71. View