» Articles » PMID: 8835706

A Double-blind, Placebo-controlled Study of Citalopram with and Without Lithium in the Treatment of Therapy-resistant Depressive Patients: a Clinical, Pharmacokinetic, and Pharmacogenetic Investigation

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1996 Aug 1
PMID 8835706
Citations 38
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Sixty-nine depressive patients (DSM III criteria: 296.2, 296.3, 296.5, 300.4) were treated with 40 to 60 mg citalopram (CIT) daily for 4 weeks. Among them, 45 responded to treatment (improvement > 50% on the 21-item Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression [HAM-D]) and continued their treatment for another week before being released from the study. The 24 nonresponders were randomized and comedicated under double-blind conditions with lithium carbonate (Li) (2 x 400 mg/day) (CIT-Li group) or with placebo (CIT-Pl group) from days 29 to 35. For days 36 to 42, the patients of both subgroups were treated openly with Li (800 mg/day) in addition to the ongoing CIT treatment. On day 35, 6 of 10 patients responded to the CIT-Li combination, whereas 2 of 14 patients only responded to the CIT-Pl combination. This group difference reached significance (p < 0.05) on day 35 with lower HAM-D total scores in the CIT-Li group. No evidence was seen of a pharmacokinetic interaction between CIT and Li, and this combination was well tolerated. Patients were phenotyped with dextromethorphan and mephenytoin at baseline and at day 28. As evaluated at baseline, three patients (responders) were poor metabolizers of dextromethorphan and six patients (three responders and three nonresponders) of mephenytoin. On day 28, the ratio CIT/N-desmethylCIT (DCIT) in plasma was significantly higher in poor than in extensive metabolizers of mephenytoin (p = 0.0001), and there was a significant positive correlation between the metabolic ratio of dextromethorphan and the ratio DCIT/N-didesmethylCIT in plasma (p < 0.001). These findings illustrate the role of CYP2D6 and CYP2C19 in the metabolism of CIT. It can be concluded that Li addition to CIT is effective in patients not responding to CIT alone without any evidence of an accentuation or provocation of adverse events.

Citing Articles

Ketamine and Other Glutamate Receptor Modulating Agents for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Shamabadi A, Ahmadzade A, Aqamolaei A, Mortazavi S, Hasanzadeh A, Akhondzadeh S Iran J Psychiatry. 2022; 17(3):320-340.

PMID: 36474699 PMC: 9699814. DOI: 10.18502/ijps.v17i3.9733.


Augmentation strategies for treatment resistant major depression: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

Nunez N, Joseph B, Pahwa M, Kumar R, Resendez M, Prokop L J Affect Disord. 2022; 302:385-400.

PMID: 34986373 PMC: 9328668. DOI: 10.1016/j.jad.2021.12.134.


Efficacy and Tolerability of Combination Treatments for Major Depression: Antidepressants plus Second-Generation Antipsychotics vs. Esketamine vs. Lithium.

Vazquez G, Bahji A, Undurraga J, Tondo L, Baldessarini R J Psychopharmacol. 2021; 35(8):890-900.

PMID: 34238049 PMC: 8358538. DOI: 10.1177/02698811211013579.


Management of Treatment-Resistant Depression in Real-World Clinical Practice Settings Across Asia.

Wang G, Han C, Liu C, Chan S, Kato T, Tan W Neuropsychiatr Dis Treat. 2020; 16:2943-2959.

PMID: 33299316 PMC: 7721287. DOI: 10.2147/NDT.S264813.


Pharmacological Augmentation in Unipolar Depression: A Guide to the Guidelines.

Taylor R, Marwood L, Oprea E, DeAngel V, Mather S, Valentini B Int J Neuropsychopharmacol. 2020; 23(9):587-625.

PMID: 32402075 PMC: 7710919. DOI: 10.1093/ijnp/pyaa033.