» Articles » PMID: 8815570

Upper Extremity Deep Venous Thrombosis in Cancer Patients with Venous Access Devices--prophylaxis with a Low Molecular Weight Heparin (Fragmin)

Overview
Journal Thromb Haemost
Publisher Thieme
Date 1996 Feb 1
PMID 8815570
Citations 44
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Central venous access devices are often essential for the administration of chemotherapy to patients with malignancy, but its use has been associated with a number of complications, mainly thrombosis. The true incidence of upper extremity deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in this setting is difficult to estimate since there are very few studies in which DVT diagnosis was based on objective tests, but its sequelae include septic thrombophlebitis, loss of central venous access and pulmonary embolism. We performed an open, prospective study in which all cancer patients who underwent placement of a long-term Port-a-Cath (Pharmacia Deltec Inc) subclavian venous catheter were randomized to receive or not 2500 IU sc of Fragmin once daily 90 days. Venography was routinely performed 90 days after catheter insertion, or sooner if DVT symptoms had appeared. Our aims were: 1) to investigate the effectiveness of low doses of Fragmin in preventing catheter-related DVT; and 2) to try to confirm if patients with high platelet counts are at a higher risk to develop subclavian DVT, as previously suggested. On the recommendation of the Ethics Committee, patient recruitment was terminated earlier than planned: DVT developed in 1/16 patients (6%) taking Fragmin and 8/13 patients (62%) without prophylaxis (Relative Risk 6.75; 95% CI: 1.05-43.58; p = 0.002, Fisher exact test). No bleeding complications had developed. As for prediction of DVT, there was a tendency towards a higher platelet count in those patients who subsequently developed DVT, but differences failed to reach any statistical significance (286 +/- 145 vs 207 +/- 81 x 10(9)/1; p = 0.067). According to our experience, Fragmin at the dosage used proved to be both effective and safe in these patients.

Citing Articles

Factor XI Inhibition for the Prevention of Catheter-Associated Thrombosis in Patients With Cancer Undergoing Central Line Placement: A Phase 2 Clinical Trial.

Pfeffer M, Kohs T, Vu H, Jordan K, Wang J, Lorentz C Arterioscler Thromb Vasc Biol. 2023; 44(1):290-299.

PMID: 37970718 PMC: 10877270. DOI: 10.1161/ATVBAHA.123.319692.


Low-Molecular-Weight Heparin Versus Warfarin in Adult Cancer Patients as a Precision Medicine for Thrombosis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Zaki H, Alkahlout B, Basharat K, Elsayed W, Abdelrahim M, Al-Marri N Cureus. 2023; 15(7):e41268.

PMID: 37533609 PMC: 10390756. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.41268.


Heparin versus 0.9% sodium chloride locking for prevention of occlusion in central venous catheters in adults.

Lopez-Briz E, Ruiz Garcia V, Cabello J, Bort-Marti S, Carbonell Sanchis R Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022; 7:CD008462.

PMID: 35849083 PMC: 9291254. DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD008462.pub4.


Treatment of portal vein thrombosis using vascular access port implantation in a Dalmatian dog: A case report.

Yoshida T, Shimada K, Matsuura K, Mandour A, Hamabe L, El-Husseiny H Open Vet J. 2022; 12(3):356-359.

PMID: 35821776 PMC: 9270933. DOI: 10.5455/OVJ.2022.v12.i3.8.


Primary Thromboprophylaxis in Patients with Malignancies: Daily Practice Recommendations by the Hemostasis Working Party of the German Society of Hematology and Medical Oncology (DGHO), the Society of Thrombosis and Hemostasis Research (GTH), and....

Kirschner M, do O Hartmann N, Parmentier S, Hart C, Henze L, Bisping G Cancers (Basel). 2021; 13(12).

PMID: 34200741 PMC: 8230401. DOI: 10.3390/cancers13122905.