» Articles » PMID: 8785714

Rapid Detection of Bovine Herpesvirus 1 in the Semen of Infected Bulls by a Nested Polymerase Chain Reaction Assay

Overview
Journal Can J Vet Res
Date 1996 Apr 1
PMID 8785714
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A nested polymerase chain reaction (PCR) assay was developed for the detection of bovine herpesvirus 1 (BHV-1) in bovine semen and compared with the virus isolation method. When extended semen, commonly used in the bovine artificial insemination industry, was inoculated with BHV-1, the PCR assay detected BHV-1 DNA in semen inoculated at 0.25-2.5 TCID50 per 0.5 mL. In contrast, the lower limit of detection for virus isolation was 250 TCID50 of BHV-1 inoculated in 0.5 mL of extended semen. These methods were also used to detect BHV-1 in the semen of four bulls which were experimentally infected with BHV-1. All infected bulls demonstrated balanitis at 3 d post-inoculation (DPI) and severe balanoposthitis at 4 DPI. BHV-1 was detected in raw semen by virus isolation and PCR at 2 DPI, before balanitis was evident. For virus isolation, the last day that BHV-1 was detected during primary infection was 7 DPI for two bulls and 9 and 11 DPI for the other two bulls. In contrast, PCR detected BHV-1 in the bulls' semen until 14 or 18 DPI. For individual animals, PCR detected BHV-1 during primary infection for at least 1-10 d longer than virus isolation. Reactivation of BHV-1 from latency without the presence of visible lesions was promoted twice by two series of 5 d dexamethasone injections. For the first series of dexamethasone treatments, a positive virus isolation result was obtained on the 5th d of treatment for only one bull. In contrast, two bulls demonstrated evidence of viral reactivation on this day by PCR. All bulls shed BHV-1 in semen on d 4 after dexamethasone treatment, as evidenced by positive virus isolation and PCR results. One bull was still PCR positive 13 d later. For the second series of dexamethasone treatments, a small amount of virus was isolated from semen collected on d 3 or 4 after treatment for two bulls but not from the other two bulls. In contrast, semen samples from all bulls were PCR positive for either or both of these 2 d. In total, from 80 semen samples, 45 were PCR positive and 26 were virus isolation positive. Thus, the PCR assay detected BHV-1 shedding in bulls earlier, more often, and for a longer duration, than did the virus isolation method.

Citing Articles

A Pioneer Transcription Factor and Type I Nuclear Hormone Receptors Synergistically Activate the Bovine Herpesvirus 1 Infected Cell Protein 0 (ICP0) Early Promoter.

Sawant L, Ostler J, Jones C J Virol. 2021; 95(20):e0076821.

PMID: 34319779 PMC: 8475507. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.00768-21.


BHV-1: new molecular approaches to control a common and widespread infection.

Turin L, Russo S, Poli G Mol Med. 1999; 5(5):261-84.

PMID: 10390543 PMC: 2230419.


Diagnostic medicine: the challenge of differentiating infection from disease and making sense for the veterinary clinician.

Evermann J, Eriks I Adv Vet Med. 1999; 41:25-38.

PMID: 9890007 PMC: 7149316. DOI: 10.1016/s0065-3519(99)80006-8.

References
1.
Drew T, Watson L, Edwards S . Effect of storage conditions and culture technique on the isolation of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis virus from bovine semen. Vet Rec. 1987; 121(23):547-8. View

2.
Vilcek S . Detection of the bovine herpesvirus-1 (BHV-1) genome by PCR. J Virol Methods. 1993; 41(2):245-7. DOI: 10.1016/0166-0934(93)90132-b. View

3.
Yates W . A review of infectious bovine rhinotracheitis, shipping fever pneumonia and viral-bacterial synergism in respiratory disease of cattle. Can J Comp Med. 1982; 46(3):225-63. PMC: 1320319. View

4.
Israel B, Herber R, Gao Y, Letchworth 3rd G . Induction of a mucosal barrier to bovine herpesvirus 1 replication in cattle. Virology. 1992; 188(1):256-64. DOI: 10.1016/0042-6822(92)90755-e. View

5.
Ackermann M, Wyler R . The DNA of an IPV strain of bovid herpesvirus 1 in sacral ganglia during latency after intravaginal infection. Vet Microbiol. 1984; 9(1):53-63. DOI: 10.1016/0378-1135(84)90078-6. View