» Articles » PMID: 8779581

Comparison of the Bile Salts and Sodium Dodecyl Sulfate Stress Responses in Enterococcus Faecalis

Overview
Date 1996 Jul 1
PMID 8779581
Citations 37
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The resistance to detergents and detergent-induced tolerance of a gastrointestinal organism, Enterococcus faecalis ATCC 19433, were examined. The most remarkable observation was the rapid response of cells in contact with bile salts and sodium dodecyl sulfate (SDS). The killing by high concentrations of detergents was nearly instantaneous. A 5-s adaptation with moderate sublethal concentrations of bile salts or SDS (0.08 or 0.01%, respectively) was sufficient to induce significant adaptation against homologous lethal conditions (0.3% bile salts or 0.017% SDS). However, resistance to a subsequent lethal challenge progressively increased further to a maximum reached after 30 min of adaptation. Furthermore, extremely strong cross-resistances were observed with bile salts- and SDS-adapted cells. However, no relationship seems to exist between levels of tolerance and de novo-synthesized proteins, since blockage of protein synthesis during adaptation had no effect on induction of resistance to bile salts and SDS. We conclude that this induced tolerance to detergent stress is independent of protein synthesis. Nevertheless, the stress-induced protein patterns of E. faecalis ATCC 19433 showed significant modifications. The rates of synthesis of 45 and 34 proteins were enhanced after treatments with bile salts and SDS, respectively. In spite of the overlap of 12 polypeptides, the protein profiles induced by the two detergents were different, suggesting that these detergents trigger different responses in E. faecalis. Therefore, bile salts cannot be substituted for SDS in biochemical detergent shock experiments with bacteria.

Citing Articles

Chemical proteomic analysis of bile acid-protein targets in .

Yang X, Zhao X, Chen V, Hang H RSC Chem Biol. 2022; 3(12):1397-1402.

PMID: 36544573 PMC: 9709779. DOI: 10.1039/d2cb00178k.


Bile Acids: Major Regulator of the Gut Microbiome.

An C, Chon H, Ku W, Eom S, Seok M, Kim S Microorganisms. 2022; 10(9).

PMID: 36144395 PMC: 9502002. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms10091792.


Probiotication of Nutritious Fruit and Vegetable Juices: An Alternative to Dairy-Based Probiotic Functional Products.

Mojikon F, Kasimin M, Molujin A, Gansau J, Jawan R Nutrients. 2022; 14(17).

PMID: 36079714 PMC: 9459872. DOI: 10.3390/nu14173457.


c-di-AMP signaling is required for bile salt resistance, osmotolerance, and long-term host colonization by .

Oberkampf M, Hamiot A, Altamirano-Silva P, Belles-Sancho P, Tremblay Y, DiBenedetto N Sci Signal. 2022; 15(750):eabn8171.

PMID: 36067333 PMC: 9831359. DOI: 10.1126/scisignal.abn8171.


Stress-Responsive Periplasmic Chaperones in Bacteria.

Kim H, Wu K, Lee C Front Mol Biosci. 2021; 8:678697.

PMID: 34046432 PMC: 8144458. DOI: 10.3389/fmolb.2021.678697.


References
1.
Ma D, Cook D, Alberti M, Pon N, Nikaido H, Hearst J . Genes acrA and acrB encode a stress-induced efflux system of Escherichia coli. Mol Microbiol. 1995; 16(1):45-55. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2958.1995.tb02390.x. View

2.
Ma D, Cook D, Hearst J, Nikaido H . Efflux pumps and drug resistance in gram-negative bacteria. Trends Microbiol. 1994; 2(12):489-93. DOI: 10.1016/0966-842x(94)90654-8. View

3.
Boutibonnes P, Giard J, Hartke A, Thammavongs B, Auffray Y . Characterization of the heat shock response in Enterococcus faecalis. Antonie Van Leeuwenhoek. 1993; 64(1):47-55. DOI: 10.1007/BF00870921. View

4.
Nikaido H, Vaara M . Molecular basis of bacterial outer membrane permeability. Microbiol Rev. 1985; 49(1):1-32. PMC: 373015. DOI: 10.1128/mr.49.1.1-32.1985. View

5.
Terzaghi B, Sandine W . Improved medium for lactic streptococci and their bacteriophages. Appl Microbiol. 1975; 29(6):807-13. PMC: 187084. DOI: 10.1128/am.29.6.807-813.1975. View