» Articles » PMID: 8747077

Follow-up Study of Finnish Volunteer Oocyte Donors Concerning Their Attitudes to Oocyte Donation

Overview
Journal Hum Reprod
Date 1995 Nov 1
PMID 8747077
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

A questionnaire was sent to the first 30 Finnish volunteer oocyte donors at 12-18 months after donation to determine their experiences concerning treatment and attitudes to donation. All donations were carried out anonymously and without payment. The donors were recruited by advertising in newspapers. Most donors were very satisfied with the experience. The side-effects of the treatment had been slight and tolerable. In all, 85% of the respondents reported no gynaecological problems afterwards. The problems reported by the other 15% were minor and unrelated to the donation. A total of 67% of the respondents would have liked to have known if pregnancy had been achieved in the recipient, and 89% reported that they had thought about the possibility of a child from their donation. Some 42% of the respondents preferred to receive no information concerning either the child or the recipient couple. Of the respondents, 59% thought the offspring should be told about its origin and 33% thought the child should be given identifying information about the donor. About half of the others would agree to the release of non-identifying information. In all, 96% of the respondents reported that their own feelings were sufficiently taken into consideration during the treatment and 78% would donate again. No-one regretted their donation.

Citing Articles

Stringent Regulations of Oocyte Donation Among Jewish Women in Israel: Characteristics and Outcomes of the National Oocyte Donation Program in One Central IVF Unit.

Preisler L, Samara N, Kalma Y, Arad T, Groutz A, Azem F J Relig Health. 2024; 64(1):124-147.

PMID: 39652246 PMC: 11845420. DOI: 10.1007/s10943-024-02200-7.


Disposition preferences in oocyte preservation patients.

Hutchinson A, Hosakoppal S, Trotter K, Confino R, Zhang J, Klock S J Assist Reprod Genet. 2022; 39(7):1619-1624.

PMID: 35587300 PMC: 9365913. DOI: 10.1007/s10815-022-02518-9.


Oocyte donors’ awareness on donation procedure and risks: A call for developing guidelines for health tourism in oocyte donation programmes.

Tulay P, Atilan O J Turk Ger Gynecol Assoc. 2018; 20(4):236-242.

PMID: 30299264 PMC: 6883756. DOI: 10.4274/jtgga.galenos.2018.2018.0110.


Attitudes toward oocyte donation among medical and nursing students and couples who have recently become parents: A Swedish study.

Sydsjo G, Nevander S, Norman S, Skoog Svanberg A Reprod Med Biol. 2018; 7(4):161-168.

PMID: 29699296 PMC: 5906885. DOI: 10.1111/j.1447-0578.2008.00214.x.


Attitudes towards disclosure and relationship to donor offspring among a national cohort of identity-release oocyte and sperm donors.

Lampic C, Skoog Svanberg A, Sydsjo G Hum Reprod. 2014; 29(9):1978-86.

PMID: 25030191 PMC: 4131739. DOI: 10.1093/humrep/deu152.