» Articles » PMID: 8732950

Scaling Basic Toxicokinetic Parameters from Rat to Man

Overview
Date 1996 Apr 1
PMID 8732950
Citations 20
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Scaling of the quantified dispositional parameters of xenobiotics from animals to man is of interest from the standpoint of toxicology (e.g., poisoning and risk assessment). Scaling is also important from the standpoint of therapeutics because it represents a strategy for predicting first-use-in-human doses in clinical trials of investigational new drugs. Current strategies for scaling either doses of xenobiotics or the dispositional parameters of xenobiotics from animals to man rely on models that take account principally of species differences in weight or body surface area. Interspecies scaling of dispositional parameters such as clearance or volume of distribution commonly involves the comparison of estimates of these parameters for a given xenobiotic among numerous species on the basis of weight with the resultant mathematical relationship used to predict the values of those parameters for that xenobiotic in a species weighing, on average, about 70 kg (i.e., a man). Our approach has been to ascertain whether a useful mathematical model could be developed for predicting the dispositional parameters of a xenobiotic, its half-life and volume of distribution, in humans based exclusively on estimates of those parameters in rats. Based on a data set of about 100 different xenobiotics, we found that values for half-life and volume of distribution of a xenobiotic in humans can be predicted from the estimates of those parameters in rats.

Citing Articles

Is Dosing of Ethambutol as Part of a Fixed-Dose Combination Product Optimal for Mechanically Ventilated ICU Patients with Tuberculosis? A Population Pharmacokinetic Study.

Beraldi-Magalhaes F, Parker S, Sanches C, Garcia L, Souza Carvalho B, Fachi M Antibiotics (Basel). 2021; 10(12).

PMID: 34943771 PMC: 8698281. DOI: 10.3390/antibiotics10121559.


Animal to human translation: a systematic scoping review of reported concordance rates.

Leenaars C, Kouwenaar C, Stafleu F, Bleich A, Ritskes-Hoitinga M, De Vries R J Transl Med. 2019; 17(1):223.

PMID: 31307492 PMC: 6631915. DOI: 10.1186/s12967-019-1976-2.


Low-Dose Curcumin Nanoparticles Normalise Blood Pressure in Male Wistar Rats with Diet-Induced Metabolic Syndrome.

du Preez R, Pahl J, Arora M, Kumar M, Brown L, Panchal S Nutrients. 2019; 11(7).

PMID: 31288419 PMC: 6682951. DOI: 10.3390/nu11071542.


A microfluidic 3D hepatocyte chip for hepatotoxicity testing of nanoparticles.

Li L, Gokduman K, Gokaltun A, Yarmush M, Usta O Nanomedicine (Lond). 2019; 14(16):2209-2226.

PMID: 31179822 PMC: 7006797. DOI: 10.2217/nnm-2019-0086.


Interpretation of Non-Clinical Data for Prediction of Human Pharmacokinetic Parameters: In Vitro-In Vivo Extrapolation and Allometric Scaling.

Choi G, Lee Y, Cho H Pharmaceutics. 2019; 11(4).

PMID: 30959827 PMC: 6523982. DOI: 10.3390/pharmaceutics11040168.


References
1.
Fujioka Y, Mizuno N, Morita E, Motozono H, Takahashi K, Yamanaka Y . Effect of age on the gastrointestinal absorption of acyclovir in rats. J Pharm Pharmacol. 1991; 43(7):465-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.2042-7158.1991.tb03515.x. View

2.
Aarons L, Mandema J, Danhof M . A population analysis of the pharmacokinetics and pharmacodynamics of midazolam in the rat. J Pharmacokinet Biopharm. 1991; 19(5):485-96. DOI: 10.1007/BF01062959. View

3.
Dickinson R, Baker P, Franklin M, Hooper W . Facile hydrolysis of mebeverine in vitro and in vivo: negligible circulating concentrations of the drug after oral administration. J Pharm Sci. 1991; 80(10):952-7. DOI: 10.1002/jps.2600801010. View

4.
Kean W, Antal E, Grace E, Cauvier H, Rischke J, BUCHANAN W . The pharmacokinetics of flurbiprofen in younger and elderly patients with rheumatoid arthritis. J Clin Pharmacol. 1992; 32(1):41-8. DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1992.tb03786.x. View

5.
Adusumalli V, Yang J, Wong K, KUCHARCZYK N, Sofia R . Felbamate pharmacokinetics in the rat, rabbit, and dog. Drug Metab Dispos. 1991; 19(6):1116-25. View