» Articles » PMID: 8709001

Effects of Mood During Exposure to Target Information on Subsequently Reported Judgments: an On-line Model of Misattribution and Correction

Overview
Specialty Psychology
Date 1996 Jul 1
PMID 8709001
Citations 8
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Three experiments investigated the effects of participants' mood during exposure to target information on delayed judgments of the target. Participants were exposed to a mood induction immediately before they acquired information about a political candidate and then reported their evaluation of the candidate at a later time. Effects of mood on judgment were moderated by 2 individual-differences measures that can be interpreted in terms of processing efficiency. These were political expertise and total recall for the candidate information, with higher scores on these indices interpreted as reflecting more efficient processing. Among low-expertise (or low-recall) perceivers, mood produced an assimilation effect on evaluative judgments. Among high-expertise (or high-recall) perceivers, mood produced a contrast effect on judgments. When pooling across these individual differences, mood exerted no influence on judgments. These findings are consistent with an on-line model of mood misattribution and overcorrection.

Citing Articles

The (Null) Effects of Happiness on Affective Polarization, Conspiracy Endorsement, and Deep Fake Recognition: Evidence from Five Survey Experiments in Three Countries.

Yu X, Wojcieszak M, Lee S, Casas A, Azrout R, Gackowski T Polit Behav. 2021; 43(3):1265-1287.

PMID: 34720307 PMC: 8550506. DOI: 10.1007/s11109-021-09701-1.


Emotionally evocative patients in the emergency department: a mixed methods investigation of providers' reported emotions and implications for patient safety.

Isbell L, Tager J, Beals K, Liu G BMJ Qual Saf. 2020; 29(10):1-2.

PMID: 31988259 PMC: 7382988. DOI: 10.1136/bmjqs-2019-010110.


When Evolution Works Against the Future: Disgust's Contributions to the Acceptance of New Food Technologies.

Egolf A, Hartmann C, Siegrist M Risk Anal. 2019; 39(7):1546-1559.

PMID: 30759314 PMC: 6850642. DOI: 10.1111/risa.13279.


Processing political misinformation: comprehending the Trump phenomenon.

Swire B, Berinsky A, Lewandowsky S, Ecker U R Soc Open Sci. 2017; 4(3):160802.

PMID: 28405366 PMC: 5383823. DOI: 10.1098/rsos.160802.


When the expectations from a message will not be realized: Naïve theories can eliminate expectation-congruent judgments via correction.

Handley I, Albarracin D, Brown R, Li H, Kumkale E, Kumkale G J Exp Soc Psychol. 2014; 45(4):933-939.

PMID: 24619304 PMC: 3947399. DOI: 10.1016/j.jesp.2009.05.010.