Probability Distribution of Molecular Evolutionary Trees: a New Method of Phylogenetic Inference

Overview

Journal J Mol Evol

Specialty Biochemistry

Date 1996 Sep 1

PMID 8703097

Citations 345

Authors

B Rannala

Z Yang

Affiliations

Soon will be listed here.

Abstract

A new method is presented for inferring evolutionary trees using nucleotide sequence data. The birth-death process is used as a model of speciation and extinction to specify the prior distribution of phylogenies and branching times. Nucleotide substitution is modeled by a continuous-time Markov process. Parameters of the branching model and the substitution model are estimated by maximum likelihood. The posterior probabilities of different phylogenies are calculated and the phylogeny with the highest posterior probability is chosen as the best estimate of the evolutionary relationship among species. We refer to this as the maximum posterior probability (MAP) tree. The posterior probability provides a natural measure of the reliability of the estimated phylogeny. Two example data sets are analyzed to infer the phylogenetic relationship of human, chimpanzee, gorilla, and orangutan. The best trees estimated by the new method are the same as those from the maximum likelihood analysis of separate topologies, but the posterior probabilities are quite different from the bootstrap proportions. The results of the method are found to be insensitive to changes in the rate parameter of the branching process.

Citing Articles

Phylodynamics beyond neutrality: the impact of incomplete purifying selection on viral phylogenies and inference.

Koelle K, Rasmussen D Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025; 380(1919):20230314.

PMID: 39976414 PMC: 11867112. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0314.

Reading tree leaves: inferring speciation anfd extinction processes using phylogenies.

Rannala B, Yang Z Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2025; 380(1919):20230309.

PMID: 39976406 PMC: 11867106. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.2023.0309.

Two novel hyphomycetes associated with ferns from China.

Zhang J, Hyde K, Zhang L, Bai S, Bao D, Al-Otibi F MycoKeys. 2025; 113:101-121.

PMID: 39925749 PMC: 11806345. DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.113.137678.

Morpho-phylogenetic evidence reveals gen. et sp. nov. and gen. et sp. nov. in Chaetosphaeriaceae.

Zhang J, Hyde K, Ma J, Wu N, Al-Otibi F, Zhang L MycoKeys. 2025; 113:123-146.

PMID: 39925748 PMC: 11806344. DOI: 10.3897/mycokeys.113.142643.

Unveiling Paramyrothecium kamalii (Stachybotryaceae) as a novel foliar fungal pathogen on Matourea azurea in Kerala, India, based on morpho-cultural, pathological and molecular phylogenetic evidences.

Kumar S, Farsana K, Mufeeda K, Singh R, Mahadevakumar S Arch Microbiol. 2025; 207(2):42.

PMID: 39853494 DOI: 10.1007/s00203-025-04243-0.

References

Yang Z . Maximum-likelihood estimation of phylogeny from DNA sequences when substitution rates differ over sites. Mol Biol Evol. 1993; 10(6):1396-401. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040082. View

Tateno Y, Takezaki N, Nei M . Relative efficiencies of the maximum-likelihood, neighbor-joining, and maximum-parsimony methods when substitution rate varies with site. Mol Biol Evol. 1994; 11(2):261-77. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040108. View

Kuhner M, Yamato J, Felsenstein J . Estimating effective population size and mutation rate from sequence data using Metropolis-Hastings sampling. Genetics. 1995; 140(4):1421-30. PMC: 1206705. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/140.4.1421. View

Felsenstein J . CONFIDENCE LIMITS ON PHYLOGENIES: AN APPROACH USING THE BOOTSTRAP. Evolution. 2017; 39(4):783-791. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1985.tb00420.x. View

Takezaki N, Rzhetsky A, Nei M . Phylogenetic test of the molecular clock and linearized trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1995; 12(5):823-33. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040259. View

Horai S, Satta Y, Hayasaka K, Kondo R, Inoue T, Ishida T . Man's place in Hominoidea revealed by mitochondrial DNA genealogy. J Mol Evol. 1992; 35(1):32-43. DOI: 10.1007/BF00160258. View

Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Yano T . Dating of the human-ape splitting by a molecular clock of mitochondrial DNA. J Mol Evol. 1985; 22(2):160-74. DOI: 10.1007/BF02101694. View

Gaut B, Lewis P . Success of maximum likelihood phylogeny inference in the four-taxon case. Mol Biol Evol. 1995; 12(1):152-62. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040183. View

Nee S, May R, Harvey P . The reconstructed evolutionary process. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 1994; 344(1309):305-11. DOI: 10.1098/rstb.1994.0068. View

10.

Fukami-Kobayashi K, Tateno Y . Robustness of maximum likelihood tree estimation against different patterns of base substitutions. J Mol Evol. 1991; 32(1):79-91. DOI: 10.1007/BF02099932. View

11.

Zharkikh A, Li W . Statistical properties of bootstrap estimation of phylogenetic variability from nucleotide sequences. I. Four taxa with a molecular clock. Mol Biol Evol. 1992; 9(6):1119-47. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040782. View

12.

Huelsenbeck J . The robustness of two phylogenetic methods: four-taxon simulations reveal a slight superiority of maximum likelihood over neighbor joining. Mol Biol Evol. 1995; 12(5):843-9. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040261. View

13.

Cavalli-Sforza L, Edwards A . PHYLOGENETIC ANALYSIS: MODELS AND ESTIMATION PROCEDURES. Evolution. 2017; 21(3):550-570. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1967.tb03411.x. View

14.

Kuhner M, Felsenstein J . A simulation comparison of phylogeny algorithms under equal and unequal evolutionary rates. Mol Biol Evol. 1994; 11(3):459-68. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040126. View

15.

Thorne J, Kishino H, Felsenstein J . Inching toward reality: an improved likelihood model of sequence evolution. J Mol Evol. 1992; 34(1):3-16. DOI: 10.1007/BF00163848. View

16.

Miyamoto M, Slightom J, Goodman M . Phylogenetic relations of humans and African apes from DNA sequences in the psi eta-globin region. Science. 1987; 238(4825):369-73. DOI: 10.1126/science.3116671. View

17.

Yang Z . Maximum likelihood phylogenetic estimation from DNA sequences with variable rates over sites: approximate methods. J Mol Evol. 1994; 39(3):306-14. DOI: 10.1007/BF00160154. View

18.

Felsenstein J . Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: a maximum likelihood approach. J Mol Evol. 1981; 17(6):368-76. DOI: 10.1007/BF01734359. View

19.

Yang Z . Phylogenetic analysis using parsimony and likelihood methods. J Mol Evol. 1996; 42(2):294-307. DOI: 10.1007/BF02198856. View

20.

Hasegawa M, Kishino H, Saitou N . On the maximum likelihood method in molecular phylogenetics. J Mol Evol. 1991; 32(5):443-5. DOI: 10.1007/BF02101285. View