» Articles » PMID: 8693441

Reliability of a Commercially Available Threshold Loading Device in Healthy Subjects and in Patients with Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview
Journal Thorax
Date 1996 Jun 1
PMID 8693441
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Threshold loading with the Nickerson and Keens' device is frequently applied in the training and assessment of inspiratory muscles. However, this equipment is not easily applied in clinical practice and training. A study was therefore designed to investigate the accuracy and reliability of the Threshold, a commercially available threshold loading device.

Methods: The resolution (accuracy) of the system was determined by measuring variation of pressure and flow during one minute in an experimental setup. The reproducibility and flow independence were then determined during threshold loading at six different inspiratory loads between 25% and 50% maximal inspiratory pressure (PImax) in 10 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) and eight healthy subjects.

Results: In the first experiment the mean variation of the sustained pressure for all loads was 1.7%. The mean coefficients of variation for pressure and flow measurements were 0.2% and 3%, respectively. In the second experiment the healthy subjects showed mean coefficients of variation for pressure and flow of 0.8% and 20.5%, respectively, and the patients showed mean coefficients of variation of 0.6% and 14.5%, respectively.

Conclusions: During the in vitro experiment as well as during the experiments in patients with COPD and in healthy subjects only small variations in pressure were observed despite large variations in flow. The Threshold is a reliable and reproducible device for loading inspiratory muscles in patients with COPD as well as in healthy subjects.

Citing Articles

Inspiratory muscle training in addition to conventional physical rehabilitation in hospitalized patients undergoing hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a randomized controlled trial.

Almeida L, Laterza M, Rondon M, Diniz Nagem Janot de Matos L, Granger C, Denehy L Support Care Cancer. 2022; 30(11):9393-9402.

PMID: 36173561 DOI: 10.1007/s00520-022-07373-z.


Tailored patient self-management and supervised, home-based, pulmonary rehabilitation for mild and moderate chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Paolucci T, Pezzi L, Bellomo R, Spacone A, Giannandrea N, Di Matteo A J Phys Ther Sci. 2022; 34(1):49-59.

PMID: 35035080 PMC: 8752276. DOI: 10.1589/jpts.34.49.


Respiratory Muscle Rehabilitation in Patients with Prolonged Mechanical Ventilation: A Targeted Approach.

Bissett B, Gosselink R, van Haren F Crit Care. 2020; 24(1):103.

PMID: 32204719 PMC: 7092518. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-020-2783-0.


Dynamic respiratory muscle function in late-onset Pompe disease.

Smith B, Allen S, Mays S, Martin A, Byrne B Sci Rep. 2019; 9(1):19006.

PMID: 31831753 PMC: 6908708. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-019-54314-8.


Reliability of an Electronic Inspiratory Loading Device for Assessing Pulmonary Function in Post-Stroke Patients.

Lee K, Kim M, Jeong J, Lee W Med Sci Monit. 2016; 22:191-6.

PMID: 26782369 PMC: 4725617. DOI: 10.12659/msm.895573.


References
1.
Black L, Hyatt R . Maximal respiratory pressures: normal values and relationship to age and sex. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1969; 99(5):696-702. DOI: 10.1164/arrd.1969.99.5.696. View

2.
Eastwood P, Hillman D . A threshold loading device for testing of inspiratory muscle performance. Eur Respir J. 1995; 8(3):463-6. DOI: 10.1183/09031936.95.08030463. View

3.
Nickerson B, Keens T . Measuring ventilatory muscle endurance in humans as sustainable inspiratory pressure. J Appl Physiol Respir Environ Exerc Physiol. 1982; 52(3):768-72. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1982.52.3.768. View

4.
Clanton T, Dixon G, Drake J, Gadek J . Inspiratory muscle conditioning using a threshold loading device. Chest. 1985; 87(1):62-6. DOI: 10.1378/chest.87.1.62. View

5.
Collett P, Perry C, Engel L . Pressure-time product, flow, and oxygen cost of resistive breathing in humans. J Appl Physiol (1985). 1985; 58(4):1263-72. DOI: 10.1152/jappl.1985.58.4.1263. View