» Articles » PMID: 8686540

Biomechanical Evaluation of Subcortical Versus Bicortical Screw Purchase in Anterior Cervical Plating

Overview
Specialty Neurosurgery
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 8686540
Citations 4
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this in vitro study is to compare the stabilities provided by anterior cervical H-plating with screws purchased either subcortically or bicortically on porcine cervical spines. Nine porcine cervical spines (C3-C4) were challenged by 12 Nm in extension followed by 6 Nm in flexion in 6 consecutive steps, i.e., (1) when disc was intact, (2) after discectomy. Subsequently, a tricortical bone graft was inserted to simulate interbody fusion. Each specimen was tested again (3) when plated with 16 mm screws to purchase subcortically and (4) after cyclic loading (f = 0.5 Hz, n = 1000), (5) when plated with 30 mm screws to purchase bicortically and (6) after cyclic loading. Neutral zone and range of motion were parameters normalized for comparison. The results showed comparable stability in constructs plated with screws purchased either subcortically or bicortically before cyclic loading. Cyclic loading deteriorated construct-bone relation in both groups, yet bicortically purchased screws rendered additional stability in anterior cervical plating.

Citing Articles

Longer Screws Decrease the Risk of Radiographic Pseudarthrosis Following Elective Anterior Cervical Discectomy and Fusion.

Chanbour H, Bendfeldt G, Johnson G, Peterson K, Ahluwalia R, Younus I Global Spine J. 2023; 15(2):858-866.

PMID: 37950628 PMC: 11877588. DOI: 10.1177/21925682231214361.


A Review of Strategies to Improve Biomechanical Fixation in the Cervical Spine.

Oitment C, Thornley P, Koziarz F, Jentzsch T, Bhanot K Global Spine J. 2022; 12(7):1596-1610.

PMID: 35020520 PMC: 9393983. DOI: 10.1177/21925682211063855.


A Surgical Method for Determining Proper Screw Length in ACDF.

Park H, Kang M, Kim K, Park J, Kim K, Kuh S Korean J Spine. 2014; 11(3):117-20.

PMID: 25346756 PMC: 4206962. DOI: 10.14245/kjs.2014.11.3.117.


4- and 5-level anterior fusions of the cervical spine: review of literature and clinical results.

Koller H, Hempfing A, Ferraris L, Maier O, Hitzl W, Metz-Stavenhagen P Eur Spine J. 2007; 16(12):2055-71.

PMID: 17605052 PMC: 2140121. DOI: 10.1007/s00586-007-0398-7.


The cervical spine and its relation to anterior plate-screw fixation: a quantitative study.

Kantelhardt S, Oberle J, Derakhshani S, Kast E Neurosurg Rev. 2005; 28(4):308-12.

PMID: 15809890 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-005-0386-5.

References
1.
Brown J, Havel P, Ebraheim N, Greenblatt S, Jackson W . Cervical stabilization by plate and bone fusion. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1988; 13(3):236-40. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198803000-00003. View

2.
Chen I, Huang C, Lee L . Biomechanical evaluation of spinal stability after disc injury in a porcine model. J Clin Neurosci. 1994; 1(2):121-4. DOI: 10.1016/0967-5868(94)90087-6. View

3.
Naito M, Kurose S, Oyama M, Sugioka Y . Anterior cervical fusion with the Caspar instrumentation system. Int Orthop. 1993; 17(2):73-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF00183545. View

4.
Schulte K, Clark C, Goel V . Kinematics of the cervical spine following discectomy and stabilization. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 1989; 14(10):1116-21. DOI: 10.1097/00007632-198910000-00015. View

5.
Maiman D, Pintar F, Yoganandan N, Reinartz J, Toselli R, Woodward E . Pull-out strength of Caspar cervical screws. Neurosurgery. 1992; 31(6):1097-101; discussion 1101. DOI: 10.1227/00006123-199212000-00016. View