» Articles » PMID: 8662007

18S RRNA Suggests That Entoprocta Are Protostomes, Unrelated to Ectoprocta

Overview
Journal J Mol Evol
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 1996 May 1
PMID 8662007
Citations 11
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The Ento- and Ectoprocta are sometimes placed together in the Bryozoa, which have variously been regarded as proto- or deuterostomes. However, Entoprocta have also been allied to the pseudocoelomates, while Ectoprocta are often united with the Brachiopoda and Phoronida in the (super)phylum Lophophorata. Hence, the phylogenetic relationships of these taxa are still much debated. We determined complete 18S rRNA sequences of two entoprocts, an ectoproct, an inarticulate brachiopod, a phoronid, two annelids, and a platyhelminth. Phylogenetic analyses of these data show that (1) entoprocts and lophophorates have spiralian, protostomous affinities, (2) Ento- and Ectoprocta are not sister taxa, (3) phoronids and brachiopods form a monophyletic clade, and (4) neither Ectoprocta or Annelida appear to be monophyletic. Both deuterostomous and pseudocoelomate features may have arisen at least two times in evolutionary history. These results advocate a Spiralia-Radialia-based classification rather than one based on the Protostomia-Deuterostomia concept.

Citing Articles

New phylogenomic data support the monophyly of Lophophorata and an Ectoproct-Phoronid clade and indicate that Polyzoa and Kryptrochozoa are caused by systematic bias.

Nesnidal M, Helmkampf M, Meyer A, Witek A, Bruchhaus I, Ebersberger I BMC Evol Biol. 2013; 13:253.

PMID: 24238092 PMC: 4225663. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2148-13-253.


The complete mitochondrial genome of Flustra foliacea (Ectoprocta, Cheilostomata) - compositional bias affects phylogenetic analyses of lophotrochozoan relationships.

Nesnidal M, Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B BMC Genomics. 2011; 12:572.

PMID: 22111761 PMC: 3285623. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-12-572.


Complete mitochondrial genome of Bugula neritina (Bryozoa, Gymnolaemata, Cheilostomata): phylogenetic position of Bryozoa and phylogeny of lophophorates within the Lophotrochozoa.

Jang K, Hwang U BMC Genomics. 2009; 10:167.

PMID: 19379522 PMC: 2678162. DOI: 10.1186/1471-2164-10-167.


Phylogenomic analyses of lophophorates (brachiopods, phoronids and bryozoans) confirm the Lophotrochozoa concept.

Helmkampf M, Bruchhaus I, Hausdorf B Proc Biol Sci. 2008; 275(1645):1927-33.

PMID: 18495619 PMC: 2593926. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2008.0372.


Myzostomida: a link between trochozoans and flatworms?.

Eeckhaut I, McHugh D, Mardulyn P, Tiedemann R, Monteyne D, Jangoux M Proc Biol Sci. 2000; 267(1451):1383-92.

PMID: 10983821 PMC: 1690696. DOI: 10.1098/rspb.2000.1154.


References
1.
De Rijk P, De Wachter R . DCSE, an interactive tool for sequence alignment and secondary structure research. Comput Appl Biosci. 1993; 9(6):735-40. DOI: 10.1093/bioinformatics/9.6.735. View

2.
Field K, Olsen G, Lane D, Giovannoni S, Ghiselin M, Raff E . Molecular phylogeny of the animal kingdom. Science. 1988; 239(4841 Pt 1):748-53. DOI: 10.1126/science.3277277. View

3.
Saitou N, Nei M . The neighbor-joining method: a new method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol Evol. 1987; 4(4):406-25. DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.molbev.a040454. View

4.
Bremer K . THE LIMITS OF AMINO ACID SEQUENCE DATA IN ANGIOSPERM PHYLOGENETIC RECONSTRUCTION. Evolution. 2017; 42(4):795-803. DOI: 10.1111/j.1558-5646.1988.tb02497.x. View

5.
Winnepenninckx B, Backeljau T, De Wachter R . Extraction of high molecular weight DNA from molluscs. Trends Genet. 1993; 9(12):407. DOI: 10.1016/0168-9525(93)90102-n. View