» Articles » PMID: 8639016

Gender and Ethnic Differences in Hospital-based Procedure Utilization in California

Overview
Journal Arch Intern Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1996 Jun 10
PMID 8639016
Citations 33
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To examine several hospital-based procedures for systematic utilization differences between the genders and among ethnic groups (Asian, black, Latino, and white).

Methods: California hospital discharges in 1989 and 1990 were sampled by principal diagnosis. Odds ratios for treatment by demographic class were estimated for heart transplantation, kidney transplantation, extracorporeal shockwave lithotripsy, hip replacement, carotid endarterectomy, coronary artery bypass grafting, percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty, pacemaker implant, and automatic cardioverter-defibrillator implant. Logistic regression controlled for insurance status, age, diagnosis, and comorbidity count.

Results: The following results were statistically significant (P < .05). Males' odds of receiving most procedures exceeded those of females by 115% (odds ratio, 2.15) for coronary artery bypass grafting, 86% for heart transplantation, 38% for defibrillator implants, 34% for angioplasty, 28% for pacemaker implants, and 24% for hip replacement. Whites' odds of receiving several procedures exceeded those of blacks by 204% for kidney transplantation, 186% for defibrillator implant, 144% for coronary artery bypass grafting, 127% for endarterectomy, and 100% for angioplasty. Whites' odds of receiving some procedures also exceeded those of Latinos by 72% for angioplasty, 58% for kidney transplantation, and 49% for coronary artery bypass grafting. Whites' odds of receiving endarterectomy or angioplasty exceeded those of Asians by 108% and 30%, respectively. Asians had 113% higher odds than whites of receiving hip replacement.

Conclusions: The array of utilization differences across 4 demographic comparisons and 9 hospital procedures suggests systematic trends in high-technology allocation. Generally, women received procedures less often than men and minorities less than whites.

Citing Articles

Trends in Cardiovascular Diseases and Costs Among Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus (T2DM) Patients in Malaysia: A Cohort Study of 240,611 Public Hospital Inpatients.

Kamarudin N, Wan Puteh S, Abd Manaf M, Shahari M Cureus. 2025; 16(12):e75531.

PMID: 39803007 PMC: 11721057. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.75531.


Sex-Based Differences in Selected Cardiac Implantable Electronic Device Use: A 10-Year Statewide Patient Cohort.

De Silva K, Nassar N, Badgery-Parker T, Kumar S, Taylor L, Kovoor P J Am Heart Assoc. 2022; 11(16):e025428.

PMID: 35943057 PMC: 9496306. DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.121.025428.


The Proportion of Marginalized Individuals in US Communities and Hospital Participation in Bundled Payments.

Liao J, Ibrahim S, Huang Q, Connolly J, Cousins D, Zhu J Popul Health Manag. 2022; 25(4):501-508.

PMID: 35532549 PMC: 9419980. DOI: 10.1089/pop.2021.0334.


Racism and Cardiology: A Global Call to Action.

Banerjee S, Cader F, Gulati M, Capers 4th Q CJC Open. 2022; 3(12 Suppl):S165-S173.

PMID: 34993445 PMC: 8712707. DOI: 10.1016/j.cjco.2021.09.014.


ER Use among Older Adult RHC Medicare Beneficiaries in the Southeastern United States.

Bagwell M, Wan T Res Sociol Health Care. 2021; 38:49-72.

PMID: 33603260 PMC: 7889049. DOI: 10.1108/S0275-495920200000038008.