» Articles » PMID: 8622818

How Can Eating Behavior Be Regulated in the Complex Environments of Free-living Humans?

Overview
Date 1996 Jan 1
PMID 8622818
Citations 12
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The eating behavior of humans in their natural environments is complexly affected by a myriad of nutritional, physiological, psychological, sociological and cultural factors. We have employed the diet diary technique to document the influence of: the subjective states of hunger, the amount of food or fluid remaining in the stomach at the onset of ingestion, and its composition, the time of day, day of the week, phase of the moon, month of the year, the location, the number of people present, the relationship of eating companions to the subject, dietary restraint, and eating disorders. Recently we have demonstrated, with twins, significant heritabilities for the amounts of foods and fluids ingested, independent of body size. By viewing behavior in free-living conditions the relative importance of these factors in the determination of the amounts and timing of intake can be discerned and measured. The analysis indicates that immediate environmental, psychological, social, and cultural stimuli exert powerful but short-lived effects on intake. Physiological stimuli, on the other hand, appear to influence intake subtly but persistently. Their influences are difficult to document on the short-term, but clear over long periods of time. Short-term intake for the most part would appear to be unregulated and allow to vary spontaneously within a relatively wide range. Physiological variables appear to feed back after a delay of at least a day and usually longer to alter the overall level of intake of bias. The persistent bias continues to shift intake, producing a cumulative net alteration of intake, while the effects of random short-term influences average over tome, and result in no effect on intake.

Citing Articles

Progression to Obesity: Variations in Patterns of Metabolic Fluxes, Fat Accumulation, and Gastrointestinal Responses.

Milhem F, Komarnytsky S Metabolites. 2023; 13(9).

PMID: 37755296 PMC: 10535155. DOI: 10.3390/metabo13091016.


Eating Behavior, Physical Activity and Exercise Training: A Randomized Controlled Trial in Young Healthy Adults.

Martinez-Avila W, Sanchez-Delgado G, Acosta F, Jurado-Fasoli L, Oustric P, Labayen I Nutrients. 2020; 12(12).

PMID: 33260423 PMC: 7760390. DOI: 10.3390/nu12123685.


Physiological Predictors of Weight Regain at 1-Year Follow-Up in Weight-Reduced Adults with Obesity.

Nymo S, Coutinho S, Rehfeld J, Truby H, Kulseng B, Martins C Obesity (Silver Spring). 2019; 27(6):925-931.

PMID: 31004405 PMC: 6593985. DOI: 10.1002/oby.22476.


Both increases and decreases in energy density lead to sustained changes in preschool children's energy intake over 5 days.

Smethers A, Roe L, Sanchez C, Zuraikat F, Keller K, Rolls B Physiol Behav. 2019; 204:210-218.

PMID: 30831180 PMC: 6475467. DOI: 10.1016/j.physbeh.2019.02.042.


Perceived impact of smaller compared with larger-sized bottles of sugar-sweetened beverages on consumption: A qualitative analysis.

Mantzari E, Hollands G, Pechey R, Jebb S, Marteau T Appetite. 2017; 120:171-180.

PMID: 28864259 PMC: 5689135. DOI: 10.1016/j.appet.2017.08.031.