» Articles » PMID: 8611781

Neglected Aspects of False Positive Findings of Mammography in Breast Cancer Screening: Analysis of False Positive Cases from the Stockholm Trial

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1996 Feb 3
PMID 8611781
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To examine the implications of false positive results of mammography in terms of the time lag from screening and complete mammography to the point when women with false positive results are declared free of cancer; the extra examinations, biopsies, and check ups required; and the cost of these extra procedures.

Design: Review of women with false positive results from the Stockholm mammography screening trial.

Setting: Department of Oncology, South Hospital, Stockholm.

Subjects: 352 and 150 women with false positive results of mammography from the first and second screening rounds of the Stockholm trial.

Main Outcome Measures: Extra examinations and investigations required and the cost of these procedures.

Results: The 352 women from the first screening round made 1112 visits to the physician and had 397 fine needle aspiration biopsies, 187 mammograms, and 90 surgical biopsies before being declared free of cancer. After six months 64% of the women (219/342) were declared cancer free. The 150 women in the second round made 427 visits to the physician and had 145 fine needle aspiration biopsies, 70 mammograms, and 28 surgical biopsies, and after six months 73% (107/147) were declared cancer free. The follow up costs of the false positive screening results were Kr2.54m (250,000 pounds) in the first round and Kr0.85m (84,000 pounds) in the second round. Women under 50 accounted for about 41% of these costs.

Conclusions: The examinations and investigation carried out after false positive mammography --especially in women under 50--and the cost of these procedures are a neglected but substantial problem.

Citing Articles

Estimating the lifetime risk of a false positive screening test result.

White T, Algeri S PLoS One. 2023; 18(2):e0281153.

PMID: 36791062 PMC: 9931091. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0281153.


Breast Cancer Screening: Is There Room for De-escalation?.

Kim L, Lannin D Curr Breast Cancer Rep. 2022; 14(4):153-161.

PMID: 36404936 PMC: 9640864. DOI: 10.1007/s12609-022-00465-z.


Why Was the US Preventive Services Task Force's 2009 Breast Cancer Screening Recommendation So Objectionable? A Historical Analysis.

Lerner B, Curtiss-Rowlands G Milbank Q. 2022; 100(3):702-721.

PMID: 36148791 PMC: 9576241. DOI: 10.1111/1468-0009.12583.


A systematic review and meta-analysis: value of ultrasound-guided vacuum-assisted biopsy in the diagnosis and treatment of breast lesions.

Lu W, Tu L, Xie D, Yao F, Lin L, Li Y Gland Surg. 2021; 10(10):3020-3029.

PMID: 34804888 PMC: 8575702. DOI: 10.21037/gs-21-611.


Preliminary Results of a New Auxiliary Mechatronic Near-Field Radar System to 3D Mammography for Early Detection of Breast Cancer.

Ghanbarzadeh Dagheyan A, Molaei A, Obermeier R, Westwood A, Martinez A, Martinez Lorenzo J Sensors (Basel). 2018; 18(2).

PMID: 29370106 PMC: 5856184. DOI: 10.3390/s18020342.


References
1.
Tabar L, Fagerberg C, Gad A, Baldetorp L, Holmberg L, GRONTOFT O . Reduction in mortality from breast cancer after mass screening with mammography. Randomised trial from the Breast Cancer Screening Working Group of the Swedish National Board of Health and Welfare. Lancet. 1985; 1(8433):829-32. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(85)92204-4. View

2.
Fentiman I . Pensive women, painful vigils: consequences of delay in assessment of mammographic abnormalities. Lancet. 1988; 1(8593):1041-2. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(88)91854-5. View

3.
Frisell J, Eklund G, Hellstrom L, Glas U, Somell A . The Stockholm breast cancer screening trial--5-year results and stage at discovery. Breast Cancer Res Treat. 1989; 13(1):79-87. DOI: 10.1007/BF01806553. View

4.
van der Maas P, de Koning H, van Ineveld B, Van Oortmarssen G, Habbema J, Lubbe K . The cost-effectiveness of breast cancer screening. Int J Cancer. 1989; 43(6):1055-60. DOI: 10.1002/ijc.2910430617. View

5.
Devitt J . False alarms of breast cancer. Lancet. 1989; 2(8674):1257-8. DOI: 10.1016/s0140-6736(89)91860-6. View