» Articles » PMID: 8575463

Phagocytic Processing of the Macrophage Endoparasite, Mycobacterium Avium, in Comparison to Phagosomes Which Contain Bacillus Subtilis or Latex Beads

Overview
Journal Eur J Cell Biol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Cell Biology
Date 1995 Oct 1
PMID 8575463
Citations 30
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The intraphagosomal survival strategy of pathogenic mycobacteria was studied in bone marrow-derived mouse macrophages. These bacteria survive inside phagosomes by interfering in an unknown manner with phagosome processing which normally would lead to digestion of the phagocytic particle in phagolysosomes. Here, phagosome processing was compared for different phagocytic particles: live Mycobacterium avium, degradable Bacillus subtilis, or indigestible latex beads. We show detailed electron microscopic morphological observations which characterize various phases of interaction between endocytic organelles and phagosomes. We measured fusion of phagosomes with early endosomes or with lysosomes by using newly internalized endocytic contents (horseradish peroxidase, HRP) and membrane marker (plasma membrane glycoconjugates labeled with [3H]galactose via exoglycosylation). Morphometric analysis of these observations showed that the nature of the phagocytic particle affects phagosome processing: As long as particles remain undigested, maturation of phagosomes is prevented and they remain fusogenic towards early endosomes; concurrent to particle digestion, phagosome processing proceeds towards transfer of phagocytic contents to phagolysosomes which display kinetic and compositional characteristics of lysosomes. As an intact phagocytic particle, M. avium remains in non-matured phagosomes which fuse with early endosomes, but not with lysosomes. Fusion with early endosomes is reduced, thereby indicating the stage where this endoparasite exerts its effect.

Citing Articles

Endoplasmic reticulum-Phagosome contact sites from the cradle to the grave.

Ghavami M, Fairn G Front Cell Dev Biol. 2023; 10:1074443.

PMID: 36619860 PMC: 9813420. DOI: 10.3389/fcell.2022.1074443.


Delivery Order of Nanoconstructs Affects Intracellular Trafficking by Endosomes.

Lee K, Jung I, Odom T J Am Chem Soc. 2022; 144(12):5274-5279.

PMID: 35302362 PMC: 9344601. DOI: 10.1021/jacs.2c02276.


Nontuberculous Mycobacteria Persistence in a Cell Model Mimicking Alveolar Macrophages.

Sousa S, Borges V, Joao I, Gomes J, Jordao L Microorganisms. 2019; 7(5).

PMID: 31035520 PMC: 6560506. DOI: 10.3390/microorganisms7050113.


Differential inhibition of adenylylated and deadenylylated forms of M. tuberculosis glutamine synthetase as a drug discovery platform.

Theron A, Roth R, Hoppe H, Parkinson C, van der Westhuyzen C, Stoychev S PLoS One. 2017; 12(10):e0185068.

PMID: 28972974 PMC: 5626031. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0185068.


The distinct fate of smooth and rough Mycobacterium abscessus variants inside macrophages.

Roux A, Viljoen A, Bah A, Simeone R, Bernut A, Laencina L Open Biol. 2016; 6(11).

PMID: 27906132 PMC: 5133439. DOI: 10.1098/rsob.160185.