» Articles » PMID: 8568659

Detection of Movements Imposed on Human Hip, Knee, Ankle and Toe Joints

Overview
Journal J Physiol
Specialty Physiology
Date 1995 Oct 1
PMID 8568659
Citations 26
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

1. The angular displacements necessary for 70% correct detection were determined in normal subjects at the hip, knee and ankle joints, and the interphalangeal joint of the big toe. Angular velocities between 0.1 and 50 deg s-1 were tested. The hip and knee joints were tested in slight flexion and the ankle and toe joints were tested in the mid-range of the normal excursion. The joints were carefully supported for testing and the muscles acting at the joints were relaxed. 2. When detection thresholds and velocities were assessed in terms of angular displacements and angular velocities, proprioceptive performances at the hip, knee and ankle joints were superior to that at the toe joint. 3. When detection levels and displacement velocities were expressed in terms of linear displacements and velocities at the tip of the extended toe for all four joints, instead of in angular terms, the ankle gave the best performance and the hip and knee the worst. 4. The detection level and velocity data were expressed also in terms of proportional changes in the fascicle lengths of muscles operating these joints. Analysis in these terms showed that performance was similar at the hip, knee and ankle joints, but that performance for the toe was much poorer than for the other joints. 5. These results for the hip, knee and ankle are similar to those previously measured for the elbow and distal interphlangeal joint of the finger, and are consistent with the theory that muscle fascicle length is the variable of significance to the central nervous system. However, the proprioceptive performance at the big toe is notably poorer than all other joints studied and analysed in terms of this variable.

Citing Articles

Relationship Between the Flexion Torque of the First Metatarsophalangeal Joint and Intrinsic Foot Muscles Depends on the Ankle Joint Position.

Otani R, Nishikawa H, Saeki J, Nakamura M Foot Ankle Orthop. 2024; 9(3):24730114241266847.

PMID: 39144612 PMC: 11322934. DOI: 10.1177/24730114241266847.


Grip force makes wrist joint position sense worse.

Li L, Li S Front Hum Neurosci. 2023; 17:1193937.

PMID: 37323932 PMC: 10264640. DOI: 10.3389/fnhum.2023.1193937.


Force Generation on the Hallux Is More Affected by the Ankle Joint Angle than the Lesser Toes: An In Vivo Human Study.

Saeki J, Iwanuma S, Torii S Biology (Basel). 2021; 10(1).

PMID: 33445422 PMC: 7828001. DOI: 10.3390/biology10010048.


Optimum Angle of Force Production Temporarily Changes Due to Growth in Male Adolescence.

Saeki J, Iizuka S, Sekino H, Suzuki A, Maemichi T, Torii S Children (Basel). 2021; 8(1).

PMID: 33401578 PMC: 7823696. DOI: 10.3390/children8010020.


Sensorimotor function in progressive multiple sclerosis.

Miehm J, Buonaccorsi J, Lim J, Sato S, Rajala C, Averill J Mult Scler J Exp Transl Clin. 2020; 6(3):2055217320934835.

PMID: 32944271 PMC: 7466899. DOI: 10.1177/2055217320934835.


References
1.
Karanjia P, FERGUSON J . Passive joint position sense after total hip replacement surgery. Ann Neurol. 1983; 13(6):654-7. DOI: 10.1002/ana.410130612. View

2.
CLARK F, Burgess R, Chapin J . Proprioception with the proximal interphalangeal joint of the index finger. Evidence for a movement sense without a static-position sense. Brain. 1986; 109 ( Pt 6):1195-208. DOI: 10.1093/brain/109.6.1195. View

3.
CLARK F, Burgess R, Chapin J, Lipscomb W . Role of intramuscular receptors in the awareness of limb position. J Neurophysiol. 1985; 54(6):1529-40. DOI: 10.1152/jn.1985.54.6.1529. View

4.
HALL L, McCloskey D . Detections of movements imposed on finger, elbow and shoulder joints. J Physiol. 1983; 335:519-33. PMC: 1197367. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1983.sp014548. View

5.
Browne K, Lee J, Ring P . The sensation of passive movement at the metatarso-phalangeal joint of the great toe in man. man. J Physiol. 1954; 126(3):448-58. PMC: 1365872. DOI: 10.1113/jphysiol.1954.sp005221. View