» Articles » PMID: 8560335

The Prevalence and Clinical Features of Internal Disc Disruption in Patients with Chronic Low Back Pain

Overview
Specialty Orthopedics
Date 1995 Sep 1
PMID 8560335
Citations 152
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Study Design: This was a cross-sectional analytic study of patients with chronic low back pain.

Objective: To investigate whether the criteria for internal disc disruption, as adopted by the International Association for the Study of Pain, could be satisfied in patients with chronic low back pain and to test whether there were any conventional clinical features that could identify this condition.

Summary Of Background Data: Internal disc disruption has been postulated as an important cause of low back pain. To diagnose this condition, the International Association for the Study of Pain taxonomy requires that pain be reproduced on provocation discography and that computed tomography discography reveal internal disc disruption, provided that as a control, stimulation of at least one other disc fails to reproduce pain.

Methods: Ninety-two consecutive patients with chronic low back pain and no history of previous lumbar surgery were studied. Each patient underwent a standard physical examination. Computed tomography discography was performed at a minimum of two levels.

Results: The diagnostic criteria for internal disc disruption were fully satisfied in 39% of patients, most commonly at L5-S1 and L4-L5. None of the clinical tests used could differentiate between those patients with internal disc disruption and other patients.

Conclusions: A diagnosis of internal disc disruption can be made in a significant proportion of patients with chronic low back pain, but no conventional clinical test can discriminate patients with internal disc disruption from patients with other conditions.

Citing Articles

Which Kind of Prognosis is Better in the Treatment of Cervical and Lumbar Disc Herniation with Coblation Nucleoplasty?.

Zhang R, Chen S, Han L, Xu B, Guo Y, Wang L J Pain Res. 2025; 18:817-826.

PMID: 39995603 PMC: 11849424. DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S500287.


Stress evaluation along the posterior annular circumferential tears on the L5-S1 spinal unit as an index of tear progression.

Vinyas , Bhat S, Yamada H, Kumar N, Adhikari R, Bhat N S J Orthop. 2025; 67:148-164.

PMID: 39935518 PMC: 11808608. DOI: 10.1016/j.jor.2025.01.026.


Ex Vivo and In Vitro Proteomic Approach to Elucidate the Relevance of IL-4 and IL-10 in Intervertebral Disc Pathophysiology.

Bermudez-Lekerika P, Tseranidou S, Kanelis E, Nuesch A, Crump K, Alexopoulos L JOR Spine. 2025; 8(1):e70048.

PMID: 39931581 PMC: 11808320. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70048.


pH: A major player in degenerative intervertebral disks.

Trone M, Stover J, Almarza A, Bowles R JOR Spine. 2024; 7(4):e70025.

PMID: 39703199 PMC: 11655178. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70025.


A novel spine tester TO GO.

Jansen J, Zengerle L, Steiner M, Sciortino V, Tryfonidou M, Wilke H JOR Spine. 2024; 7(4):e70002.

PMID: 39469185 PMC: 11513258. DOI: 10.1002/jsp2.70002.