Intracellular Fate of Mycobacterium Avium: Use of Dual-label Spectrofluorometry to Investigate the Influence of Bacterial Viability and Opsonization on Phagosomal PH and Phagosome-lysosome Interaction
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Mycobacterium avium is a facultative intracellular pathogen that can survive and replicate within macrophages. We tested the hypotheses that survival mechanisms may include alteration of phagosomal pH or inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion. M. avium was surface labeled with N-hydroxysuccinimidyl esters of carboxyfluorescein (CF) and rhodamine (Rho) to enable measurement of the pH of individual M. avium-containing phagosomes and the interactions of bacterium-containing phagosomes with labeled secondary lysosomes. CF fluorescence is pH sensitive, whereas Rho is pH insensitive; pH can be calculated from their fluorescence ratios. Surface labeling of M. avium did not affect viability in broth cultures or within J774, a murine macrophage-like cell line. By fluorescence spectroscopy, live M. avium was exposed to an environmental pH of approximately 5.7 at 6 h after phagocytosis, whereas similarly labeled Salmonella typhimurium, zymosan A, or heat-killed M. avium encountered an environmental pH of < 5.0. Video fluorescence and laser scanning confocal microscopy gave consistent pH results and demonstrated the heterogeneity of intracellular fate early in infection. pH became more homogeneous 6 h after infection. M. avium cells were coated with immunoglobulin G (IgG) or opsonized to investigate whether phagocytosis by the corresponding receptors would alter intracellular fate. Opsonized, unopsonized, and IgG-coated M. avium cells entered compartments of similar pH. Finally, the spatial distribution of intracellular bacteria and secondary lysosomes was compared. Only 18% of live fluorescent M. avium cells colocalized with fluorescent lysosomes, while 98% of heat-killed bacteria colocalized. Thus, both inhibition of phagosome-lysosome fusion and alteration of phagosomal pH may contribute to the intracellular survival of M. avium.
Zheng R, Li Z, Fang W, Lou H, Liu F, Sun Q Cell Rep Med. 2025; 6(2):101923.
PMID: 39848245 PMC: 11866518. DOI: 10.1016/j.xcrm.2024.101923.
Kelley M, Sasaninia K, Abnousian A, Badaoui A, Owens J, Beever A Pathogens. 2023; 12(8).
PMID: 37624017 PMC: 10459066. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens12081057.
Villanueva J, Crooks A, Nagy T, Quintana J, Dalebroux Z, Detweiler C mBio. 2022; 13(5):e0179022.
PMID: 36135367 PMC: 9601186. DOI: 10.1128/mbio.01790-22.
Chemical Synthesis of Cell Wall Constituents of .
Holzheimer M, Buter J, Minnaard A Chem Rev. 2021; 121(15):9554-9643.
PMID: 34190544 PMC: 8361437. DOI: 10.1021/acs.chemrev.1c00043.
Antimycobacterial Potential of Mycobacteriophage Under Disease-Mimicking Conditions.
Kalapala Y, Sharma P, Agarwal R Front Microbiol. 2020; 11:583661.
PMID: 33381088 PMC: 7767895. DOI: 10.3389/fmicb.2020.583661.