» Articles » PMID: 8535995

Reconstruction of the Posterior Cruciate Ligament Using a New Drill-guide

Overview
Publisher Wiley
Date 1993 Jan 1
PMID 8535995
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In 40 normal cadaver knees from adults (mean age 29 years) the average length of the posterior cruciate ligament was 38 +/- 4 mm. The angle between the ligament and the long axis of the femur was 43.4 +/- 3 degrees with the knee in full extension. We studied the functional importance of different attachments of the posterior cruciate ligament. The distance between the central point of the normal attachment area on the tibia and the central proximal part of the femoral attachment area on the medial femoral condyle was found to change least during full range of knee motion. On the basis of the results in the present study we suggest some basic principles for a standardized replacement operation for a deficient posterior cruciate ligament using a new drill-guide. The drill-guide has been used in 14 consecutive patients (mean age 26 +/- 6 years) who underwent a reconstruction of the posterior cruciate ligament. The patients have been followed for 2 years. The Lysholm score increased significantly from 60 +/- 16 preoperatively to 76 +/- 15 (P < 0.001) at 2 years, and the stability, measured with a laxity tester, improved from 8 +/- 3 mm total excursion preoperatively to 6 +/- 3 mm at 2 years follow-up. The follow-up time is still short but the results seem to be promising.

Citing Articles

Knee evaluation in two systems and magnetic resonance imaging after operative treatment of posterior cruciate ligament injuries.

Buess E, Imhoff A, Hodler J Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 1996; 115(6):307-12.

PMID: 8905102 DOI: 10.1007/BF00420321.


Positioning of the posterior cruciate ligament.

Juergensen K, Edwards J, Jakob R Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 1994; 2(3):133-7.

PMID: 7584194 DOI: 10.1007/BF01467914.

References
1.
Grood E, Hefzy M, Lindenfield T . Factors affecting the region of most isometric femoral attachments. Part I: The posterior cruciate ligament. Am J Sports Med. 1989; 17(2):197-207. DOI: 10.1177/036354658901700209. View

2.
GELY P, DROUIN G, Thiry P, Tremblay G . Torsion and bending imposed on a new anterior cruciate ligament prosthesis during knee flexion: an evaluation method. J Biomech Eng. 1984; 106(4):285-94. DOI: 10.1115/1.3138496. View

3.
Clancy Jr W, Shelbourne K, Zoellner G, Keene J, Reider B, Rosenberg T . Treatment of knee joint instability secondary to rupture of the posterior cruciate ligament. Report of a new procedure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1983; 65(3):310-22. View

4.
Odensten M, Gillquist J . Functional anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament and a rationale for reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1985; 67(2):257-62. View

5.
Odensten M, Gillquist J . A modified technique for anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) surgery using a new drill guide for isometric positioning of the ACL. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1986; (213):154-8. View