» Articles » PMID: 8528072

The Use of Natural and Unnatural Amino Acid Substrates to Define the Substrate Specificity Differences of Escherichia Coli Aspartate and Tyrosine Aminotransferases

Overview
Journal Protein Sci
Specialty Biochemistry
Date 1995 Sep 1
PMID 8528072
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The tyrosine (eTATase) and aspartate (eAATase) aminotransferases of Escherichia coli transaminate diacarboxylic amino acids with similar rate constants. However, eTATase exhibits approximately 10(2)-10(4)-fold higher second-order rate constants for the transamination of aromatic amino acids than does eAATase. A series of natural and unnatural amino acid substrates was used to quantitate specificity differences for these two highly related enzymes. A general trend toward lower transamination activity with increasing side-chain length (extending from aspartate to glutamate to alpha-aminoadipate) is observed for both enzymes. This result suggests that dicarboxylate ligands associate with the two highly related enzymes in a similar manner. The high reactivity of the enzymes with L-Asp and L-Glu can be attributed to an ion pair interaction between the side-chain carboxylate of the amino acid substrate and the guanidino group of the active site residue Arg 292 that is common to both enzymes. A strong linear correlation between side-chain hydrophobicity and transamination rate constants obtains for n-alkyl side-chain amino substrates with eTATase, but not for eAATase. The present kinetic data support a model in which eAATase contains one binding mode for all classes of substrate, whereas the active site of eTATase allows an additional mode that has increased affinity for hydrophobic amino acid.

Citing Articles

A platform for distributed production of synthetic nitrated proteins in live bacteria.

Butler N, Sen S, Brown L, Lin M, Kunjapur A Nat Chem Biol. 2023; 19(7):911-920.

PMID: 37188959 DOI: 10.1038/s41589-023-01338-x.


A Novel Aminoacyl-tRNA Synthetase Appended Domain Can Supply the Core Synthetase with Its Amino Acid Substrate.

Muraski M, Nilsson E, Weekley B, Sharma S, Alexander R Genes (Basel). 2020; 11(11).

PMID: 33171705 PMC: 7694997. DOI: 10.3390/genes11111320.


Production of p-amino-L-phenylalanine (L-PAPA) from glycerol by metabolic grafting of Escherichia coli.

Mohammadi Nargesi B, Trachtmann N, Sprenger G, Youn J Microb Cell Fact. 2018; 17(1):149.

PMID: 30241531 PMC: 6148955. DOI: 10.1186/s12934-018-0996-6.


Improving the Production of L-Phenylalanine by Identifying Key Enzymes Through Multi-Enzyme Reaction System in Vitro.

Ding D, Liu Y, Xu Y, Zheng P, Li H, Zhang D Sci Rep. 2016; 6:32208.

PMID: 27558633 PMC: 4997321. DOI: 10.1038/srep32208.


Redesign of the substrate specificity of Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferase to that of Escherichia coli tyrosine aminotransferase by homology modeling and site-directed mutagenesis.

Onuffer J, KIRSCH J Protein Sci. 1995; 4(9):1750-7.

PMID: 8528073 PMC: 2143225. DOI: 10.1002/pro.5560040910.

References
1.
Mullis K, Faloona F . Specific synthesis of DNA in vitro via a polymerase-catalyzed chain reaction. Methods Enzymol. 1987; 155:335-50. DOI: 10.1016/0076-6879(87)55023-6. View

2.
MAVRIDES C . Transamination of aromatic amino acids in Escherichia coli. Methods Enzymol. 1987; 142:253-67. DOI: 10.1016/s0076-6879(87)42035-1. View

3.
Hayashi H, Kuramitsu S, Inoue Y, Morino Y, KAGAMIYAMA H . [Arg292----Val] or [Arg292----Leu] mutation enhances the reactivity of Escherichia coli aspartate aminotransferase with aromatic amino acids. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 1989; 159(1):337-42. DOI: 10.1016/0006-291x(89)92443-1. View

4.
Seville M, Vincent M, Hahn K . Modeling the three-dimensional structures of bacterial aminotransferases. Biochemistry. 1988; 27(22):8344-9. DOI: 10.1021/bi00422a009. View

5.
Julin D, KIRSCH J . Kinetic isotope effect studies on aspartate aminotransferase: evidence for a concerted 1,3 prototropic shift mechanism for the cytoplasmic isozyme and L-aspartate and dichotomy in mechanism. Biochemistry. 1989; 28(9):3825-33. DOI: 10.1021/bi00435a031. View