» Articles » PMID: 8527349

A Double-blind Comparison of Once-daily Metoprolol Controlled-release and Atenolol in the Treatment of Chinese Patients with Mild to Moderate Hypertension

Overview
Date 1995 Jun 1
PMID 8527349
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The efficacy and tolerability of controlled-release metoprolol (metoprolol CR/ZOK), 100-200 mg, and atenolol, 50-100 mg, once daily was compared in Chinese patients with mild to moderate essential hypertension. The study was of a randomized, double-blind, two-way crossover design. The active treatment periods lasted 4 weeks each and were preceded by a 4-week placebo run-in period. The two double-blind phases were separated by a 2-week washout period on placebo. Blood pressures and heart rates were measured at rest in each 2-week visit and during exercise at the end of each treatment period. Twenty-four patients (M/F = 14/10) were valid for efficacy analysis. Their ages ranged from 39 to 68, with a mean of 53.5 years. The rest supine blood pressure and heart rate before active treatment was 160 +/- 15/106 +/- 6 mmHg and 75 +/- 14 beats/min (mean +/- SD), respectively. A responder was defined as exhibiting a supine diastolic blood pressure < or = 90 mmHg or a supine diastolic blood pressure reduction of at least 10% of the baseline level. Both agents had high response rate: 88% and 92% of all patients responded to metoprolol CR/ZOK and atenolol, respectively. Both active treatments considerably reduced resting systolic and diastolic blood pressures and heart rates as compared with baseline (p < 0.001), respectively. With controlled-release metoprolol, a more pronounced beta 1 blockade was obtained than with atenolol, which was expressed as a significant reduction in exercise-induced heart rate at the highest comparable workload compared with placebo (p < 0.05). These findings are compatible with those reported from western populations.

Citing Articles

Comparative efficacy of two different beta-blockers on 24-hour blood pressure control.

Sarafidis P, Bogojevic Z, Basta E, Kirstner E, Bakris G J Clin Hypertens (Greenwich). 2008; 10(2):112-8.

PMID: 18259123 PMC: 8109968. DOI: 10.1111/j.1751-7176.2008.08021.x.


Ethnic specific recommendations in clinical practice guidelines: a first exploratory comparison between guidelines from the USA, Canada, the UK, and the Netherlands.

Manna D, Bruijnzeels M, Mokkink H, Berg M Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12(5):353-8.

PMID: 14532367 PMC: 1743772. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.5.353.

References
1.
Ryden L, Kristensson B, Westergren G . Effect of controlled-release metoprolol on blood pressure and exercise heart rate in hypertension: a comparison with conventional tablets. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 33 Suppl:S33-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00578410. View

2.
Sandberg A, Ragnarsson G, Jonsson U, Sjogren J . Design of a new multiple-unit controlled-release formulation of metoprolol--metoprolol CR. Eur J Clin Pharmacol. 1988; 33 Suppl:S3-7. DOI: 10.1007/BF00578405. View

3.
Patrick J, Bassey J, Morrant J, Macdonald I . Effects of a week's beta-adrenoceptor blockade with atenolol and metoprolol CR/ZOK on the response to exercise in healthy women aged 50 to 70 years. J Clin Pharmacol. 1990; 30(S2):S108-16. DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1990.tb03507.x. View

4.
Lee Y, Liau C, Wong E, Chen W, Chen M, Chen C . Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic comparison of conventional and controlled release formulations of metoprolol [correction of motoprolol] in healthy Chinese subjects. Cardiovasc Drugs Ther. 1989; 3(4):529-33. DOI: 10.1007/BF01865512. View

5.
Darmansjah I, Wong E, Setiawati A, Moeloek D, Irawati D, Siagian M . Pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic properties of controlled release (CR/ZOK) metoprolol in healthy Oriental subjects: a comparison with conventional formulations of metoprolol and atenolol. J Clin Pharmacol. 1990; 30(S2):S39-45. DOI: 10.1002/j.1552-4604.1990.tb03494.x. View