» Articles » PMID: 8489316

Management of Major Biliary Complications After Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy

Overview
Journal Ann Surg
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1993 May 1
PMID 8489316
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: A total of 50 major bile duct injuries after laparoscopic cholecystectomy were managed by the Duke University Hepatobiliary Service from 1990-1992. The management of these complex cases is reviewed.

Summary Background Data: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy is the preferred method for removing the gallbladder. Bile duct injury is the most feared complication of the new procedure.

Methods: Review of videotapes, pathology, and management of the original operations were reviewed retrospectively, and the injuries categorized. Major biliary injury was defined as a recognized disruption of any part of the major extrahepatic biliary system. Biliary leakage was defined as a clinically significant biliary fistula in the absence of major biliary injury, i.e., with an intact extrahepatic biliary system.

Results: Thirty-eight injuries were major biliary ductal injuries and 12 patients had simple biliary leakage. Twenty-four patients had the classic type injury or some variant of the classic injury. A standard treatment approach was developed which consisted of ERCP for diagnosis, preoperative PTC with the placement of stents, CT drainage immediately after the PTC for drainage of biliary ascites, and usually Roux-en-Y hepaticojejunostomy with placement of O-rings for future biliary access if necessary. Major ductal injuries were high in the biliary system involving multiple ducts in 31 of the 38 patients. Re-operation was required in 5 of the 38 patients with particularly complex problems.

Conclusions: Successful management of bile duct injury after laparoscopic cholecystectomy requires careful understanding of the mechanisms, considerable preoperative assessment by experts, and a multidisciplinary approach.

Citing Articles

Percutaneous Management of Hepatic Duct Injury Using Extra-Anatomic Biliary Catheters.

Justaniah A, Abughararah M, Ahmad N, Ashour M, Alqarni H Cureus. 2023; 15(2):e35012.

PMID: 36938281 PMC: 10021372. DOI: 10.7759/cureus.35012.


Biliary Cripple and the Spectrum of Complications following Cholecystectomy: A Case Report.

Shrestha A, Sah J, Ghimire B, Bhandari A, Shrestha A Case Rep Surg. 2022; 2022:5370722.

PMID: 36245685 PMC: 9553510. DOI: 10.1155/2022/5370722.


Excision of a part of the bile duct as an iatrogenic injury typical for laparoscopic cholecystectomy - characteristics, treatment and long-term results, based on own material.

Durowicz S, Kozicki I, Ciesielski A, Tarnowski W Wideochir Inne Tech Maloinwazyjne. 2020; 15(1):70-79.

PMID: 32117488 PMC: 7020707. DOI: 10.5114/wiitm.2019.85806.


Choledochoplasty with Gallbladder Wall Free Flap: A Novel Technique for Large Bile Duct Defects from Mirizzi Syndrome in High-Risk Patients-A Case Report and Literature Review.

Chai L, Xiao G Case Rep Surg. 2019; 2019:4615484.

PMID: 31467763 PMC: 6701271. DOI: 10.1155/2019/4615484.


Restoration of Completely Transected Common Bile Duct Continuity Using Single Operator Cholangioscopy.

Emhmed Ali S, Mardini H, Salih M, Krohmer S, Frandah W ACG Case Rep J. 2017; 4:e111.

PMID: 29043289 PMC: 5636918. DOI: 10.14309/crj.2017.111.


References
1.
MCSHERRY C . Cholecystectomy: the gold standard. Am J Surg. 1989; 158(3):174-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(89)90246-8. View

2.
Rossi R, Schirmer W, BRAASCH J, Sanders L, Munson J . Laparoscopic bile duct injuries. Risk factors, recognition, and repair. Arch Surg. 1992; 127(5):596-601; discussion 601-2. DOI: 10.1001/archsurg.1992.01420050124016. View

3.
Davidoff A, Pappas T, Murray E, Hilleren D, Johnson R, Baker M . Mechanisms of major biliary injury during laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Ann Surg. 1992; 215(3):196-202. PMC: 1242421. DOI: 10.1097/00000658-199203000-00002. View

4.
Cuschieri A, Dubois F, Mouiel J, Mouret P, Becker H, Buess G . The European experience with laparoscopic cholecystectomy. Am J Surg. 1991; 161(3):385-7. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9610(91)90603-b. View