Characterization of CBF Response to Somatosensory Stimulation: Model and Influence of Anesthetics
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
We investigated the cerebral blood flow (CBF) response to somatosensory stimulation. Stimulation of neuronal activity was performed by deflection (2-3/s) of the mystacial vibrissae in rats over a period of 60 s, and regional cortical CBF was measured continuously in the contralateral somatosensory cortex with laser-Doppler flowmetry. CBF within the somatosensory cortex was studied through the parietal bone thinned to translucency (n = 7) or through a closed cranial window with the dura mater removed (n = 7). In addition, the differential effect of anesthetics (halothane-N2O, n = 5; thiobutabarbiturate, n = 5; and alpha-chloralose, n = 7) on the CBF response to stimulation was investigated. After a rapid increase after stimulation onset (maximum reached within 2-3 s), CBF remained above baseline with a slight tendency to decrease despite continued stimulation. On termination of stimulation, CBF fell to near prestimulation values within 2-3 s. The following mean CBF responses above baseline during the 60-s stimulation period were obtained: halothane-N2O anesthesia, 25.4 +/- 5.9%; thiobutabarbiturate anesthesia, 10.6 +/- 2.4%; and alpha-chloralose anesthesia, 16.9 +/- 2.3 (through the translucent bone) and 16.2 +/- 2.9% (closed cranial window, dura removed). We conclude that coupling of CBF to neuronal function has a very high temporal resolution (< 3 s) and that whisker deflection in rats provides a physiological stimulus to study coupling with laser-Doppler flowmetry.
Setting standards for brain collection procedures in metabolomic studies.
Dienel G, Nowak Jr T J Cereb Blood Flow Metab. 2025; :271678X251314331.
PMID: 39862175 PMC: 11765310. DOI: 10.1177/0271678X251314331.
Cortical plasticity is associated with blood-brain barrier modulation.
Swissa E, Monsonego U, Yang L, Schori L, Kamintsky L, Mirloo S Elife. 2024; 12.
PMID: 39024007 PMC: 11257677. DOI: 10.7554/eLife.89611.
Becker K Cell Mol Neurobiol. 2023; 43(8):3965-3981.
PMID: 37861870 PMC: 11407738. DOI: 10.1007/s10571-023-01418-5.
Theriault J, Shaffer C, Dienel G, Sander C, Hooker J, Dickerson B Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2023; 153:105373.
PMID: 37634556 PMC: 10591873. DOI: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2023.105373.
Current Review of Optical Neural Interfaces for Clinical Applications.
Park Y, Park S, Eom K Micromachines (Basel). 2021; 12(8).
PMID: 34442547 PMC: 8400671. DOI: 10.3390/mi12080925.