Magnetic Resonance Imaging Evaluation of the Spine with Metal Implants. General Safety and Superior Imaging with Titanium
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
We studied the cases of 15 patients who underwent postoperative magnetic resonance imaging evaluation after being treated with metal spinal implants. Spine stabilization was required in traumatic injuries for eight patients, cancer destruction in four patients, late cervical subluxation in one patient, spondylosis in one patient, and spondylolisthesis in one patient. A variety of stainless steel and titanium spinal implants were used. The images were evaluated for spinal and implant positioning and artifact production. Both stainless steel and titanium implants were imaged safely and there was no evidence of implant migration of local tissue-heating effect. The titanium spinal implants allowed postoperative spine imaging without the significant image distortion characteristic of the stainless steel implants. The stainless steel implants created significant artifact that impaired the usefulness of the magnetic resonance imaging evaluation.
Marcel A, Alaia E, Alaia M, Katz L, Medvecky M, Porrino J Skeletal Radiol. 2023; 53(3):525-536.
PMID: 37695343 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-023-04445-x.
Addevico F, Simoncini A, Solitro G, Morandi M J Funct Morphol Kinesiol. 2022; 7(1).
PMID: 35076530 PMC: 8788467. DOI: 10.3390/jfmk7010004.
Byvaltsev V, Kalinin A, Giers M, Shepelev V, Pestryakov Y, Biryuchkov M Diagnostics (Basel). 2021; 11(5).
PMID: 34069625 PMC: 8161371. DOI: 10.3390/diagnostics11050906.
Are titanium implants actually safe for magnetic resonance imaging examinations?.
Kim Y, Choi M, Kim J Arch Plast Surg. 2019; 46(1):96-97.
PMID: 30685951 PMC: 6369045. DOI: 10.5999/aps.2018.01466.
Park H, Park J, Chin D, Lee K, Hong C Neurosurg Rev. 2018; 43(1):119-129.
PMID: 30116987 DOI: 10.1007/s10143-018-1020-7.