» Articles » PMID: 8464246

Physician Frustration in Communicating with Patients

Overview
Journal Med Care
Specialty Health Services
Date 1993 Apr 1
PMID 8464246
Citations 34
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, the nature of practicing physicians' "frustrating" visits was explored and a guide to help physicians identify problems in communicating with patients was developed. The study included 1,076 practicing physicians who attended a voluntary workshop on physician-patient communication. The physicians were from multiple specialties and diverse work settings geographically dispersed throughout the United States. The method included development of a preliminary item pool (descriptions of frustrating patients and occasions) by experienced physicians and teachers of medical communication, additions/deletions/revisions of items within the pool, empirical analyses to reduce redundancy and group-like items, and construct validation of the final 25-item questionnaire. Factor analysis was used to identify subscales. Physicians most often attributed communication problems to the patient rather than to their own limitations. Seven types of communication problems (subscales) were identified, including: 1) lack of trust/agreement, 2) too many problems, 3) feeling distressed, 4) lack of understanding, 5) lack of adherence, 6) demanding/controlling patient, and 7) special problems. Primary care physicians reported greater problems than specialists on four subscales. Physicians practicing in health maintenance organizations reported greater problems than physicians in fee-for-service practice on five subscales. Seven sources of frustration physicians experience in their work with patients were identified. Understanding these frustrations will allow physicians to reflect on their own experiences and potentially improve the quality of their patient visits.

Citing Articles

Cross- analyzing the opinions and experiences of nurses, physiotherapists, dentists, midwives, and pharmacists with respect to addictive disorder screening in primary care: A qualitative study.

Edeline A, Tripault A, Lebeau J, Pautrat M PLoS One. 2025; 20(1):e0315926.

PMID: 39854522 PMC: 11759999. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0315926.


Cross-analyzing addiction specialist and patient opinions and experiences about addictive disorder screening in primary care to identify interaction-related obstacles: a qualitative study.

Pautrat M, Renard C, Riffault V, Ciolfi D, Edeline A, Breton H Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy. 2023; 18(1):12.

PMID: 36803797 PMC: 9938560. DOI: 10.1186/s13011-023-00522-5.


An ethical analysis of endoscopic therapy decision-making in patients with refractory substance use disorder and chronic pancreatitis.

Al-Moussally F, Fogel E, Helft P Pancreatology. 2022; 22(6):671-677.

PMID: 35691886 PMC: 10118247. DOI: 10.1016/j.pan.2022.05.007.


Vulnerability identified in clinical practice: a qualitative analysis.

Sossauer L, Schindler M, Hurst S BMC Med Ethics. 2019; 20(1):87.

PMID: 31775728 PMC: 6880593. DOI: 10.1186/s12910-019-0416-4.


Change in Patient Activation and Mental Illness Symptoms After Communication Training: A Multisite Study With a Diverse Patient Sample.

Chiang M, Chang J, Nakash O, Cruz-Gonzalez M, Fillbrunn M, Alegria M Psychiatr Serv. 2019; 70(8):696-702.

PMID: 31084292 PMC: 6675648. DOI: 10.1176/appi.ps.201800216.