» Articles » PMID: 8460178

Bone-graft Reconstruction of the Monkey Orbital Floor with Iliac Grafts and Titanium Mesh Plates: a Histometric Study

Overview
Specialty General Surgery
Date 1993 Apr 1
PMID 8460178
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Bone-graft reconstruction of large orbital defects has been difficult because of a lack of marginal support of the grafts and unpredictable resorption. A titanium mesh orbital plate has been developed to provide this marginal support for bone grafts. However, the problem of unpredictable bone-graft resorption remains. To determine if this plate has any effect on graft resorption, this study was designed to quantitate the dimensions and composition of bone autografts (1) with and without titanium plate support and (2) in the anterior and posterior orbit. Bilateral full-thickness large orbital floor defects were surgically created in five monkeys, and a titanium orbital floor plate was fixed with screws into the right orbit. Two iliac crest grafts were measured and placed transversely and without fixation in each orbit, one anterior and the other posterior to the axis of the globe. The orbits were retrieved 28 weeks after surgery and were analyzed histologically and histometrically. Comparison of the supported and nonsupported grafts revealed no differences in their histologic appearance. There were three significant histometric findings: (1) resorption of bone was similar for those grafts which spanned an orbital floor defect and those which were supported by a titanium plate; (2) resorption of grafts in the posterior orbit did not differ from that of grafts in the anterior orbit; and (3) resorption of approximately one-third of bone-graft thickness and width had taken place during the 28-week study interval. We conclude that the benefits of bone-graft support by a titanium mesh orbital floor plate are not offset by any alteration in bone-graft resorption.

Citing Articles

The Dilemma of Reconstructive Material Choice for Orbital Floor Fracture: A Narrative Review.

Sivam A, Enninghorst N Medicines (Basel). 2022; 9(1).

PMID: 35049939 PMC: 8778999. DOI: 10.3390/medicines9010006.


A Comparative Study of Orbital Blow Out Fracture Repair, Using Autogenous Bone Graft and Alloplastic Materials.

Saha A, Samaddar S, Kumar A, Chakraborty A, Deb B Indian J Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2019; 71(4):542-549.

PMID: 31750117 PMC: 6838252. DOI: 10.1007/s12070-019-01724-9.


In Situ Splitting of a Rib Bone Graft for Reconstruction of Orbital Floor and Medial Wall.

Uemura T, Yanai T, Yasuta M, Harada Y, Morikawa A, Watanabe H Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2017; 10(2):123-129.

PMID: 28603580 PMC: 5465312. DOI: 10.1055/s-0036-1597915.


A review of materials currently used in orbital floor reconstruction.

Mok D, Lessard L, Cordoba C, Harris P, Nikolis A Can J Plast Surg. 2013; 12(3):134-40.

PMID: 24115885 PMC: 3792801. DOI: 10.1177/229255030401200302.


Mandibular symphysis graft versus iliac cortical graft in reconstructing floor in orbital blow out fracture: A comparative study.

Anitha G, Uma Maheswari G, Sethurajan B Ann Maxillofac Surg. 2013; 2(1):24-9.

PMID: 23482420 PMC: 3591074. DOI: 10.4103/2231-0746.95312.