» Articles » PMID: 8457667

Nonideal Mixing of Phosphatidylserine and Phosphatidylcholine in the Fluid Lamellar Phase

Overview
Journal Biophys J
Publisher Cell Press
Specialty Biophysics
Date 1993 Feb 1
PMID 8457667
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The mixing of phosphatidylserine (PS) and phosphatidylcholine (PC) in fluid bilayer model membranes was studied by measuring binding of aqueous Ca2+ ions. The measured [Ca2+]aq was used to derive the activity coefficient for PS, gamma PS, in the lipid mixture. For (16:0, 18:1) PS in binary mixtures with either (16:0, 18:1)PC, (14:1, 14:1)PC, or (18:1, 18:1)PC, gamma PS > 1; i.e., mixing is nonideal, with PS and PC clustered rather than randomly distributed, despite the electrostatic repulsion between PS headgroups. To understand better this mixing behavior, Monte Carlo simulations of the PS/PC distributions were performed, using Kawasaki relaxation. The excess energy was divided into an electrostatic term Uel and one adjustable term including all other nonideal energy contributions, delta Em. Uel was calculated using a discrete charge theory. Kirkwood's coupling parameter method was used to calculate the excess free energy of mixing, delta GEmix, hence In gamma PS,calc. The values of In gamma PS,calc were equalized by adjusting delta Em in order to find the simulated PS/PC distribution that corresponded to the experimental results. We were thus able to compare the smeared charge calculation of [Ca2+]surf with a calculation ("masked evaluation method") that recognized clustering of the negatively charged PS: clustering was found to have a modest effect on [Ca2+]surf, relative to the smeared charge model. Even though both PS and PC tend to cluster, the long-range nature of the electrostatic repulsion reduces the extent of PS clustering at low PS mole fraction compared to PC clustering at an equivalent low PC mole fraction.

Citing Articles

Dipole Potential of Monolayers with Biologically Relevant Lipid Compositions.

Cardoso R, Lairion F, Disalvo E, Loura L, Moreno M Molecules. 2025; 29(24.

PMID: 39769931 PMC: 11679974. DOI: 10.3390/molecules29245843.


Cholesterol Promotes Protein Binding by Affecting Membrane Electrostatics and Solvation Properties.

Doktorova M, Heberle F, Kingston R, Khelashvili G, Cuendet M, Wen Y Biophys J. 2017; 113(9):2004-2015.

PMID: 29117524 PMC: 5685651. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2017.08.055.


Effects of Membrane Charge and Order on Membrane Binding of the Retroviral Structural Protein Gag.

Wen Y, Dick R, Feigenson G, Vogt V J Virol. 2016; 90(20):9518-32.

PMID: 27512076 PMC: 5044813. DOI: 10.1128/JVI.01102-16.


Monte Carlo simulation of protein-induced lipid demixing in a membrane with interactions derived from experiment.

Almeida P, Best A, Hinderliter A Biophys J. 2011; 101(8):1930-7.

PMID: 22004747 PMC: 3192976. DOI: 10.1016/j.bpj.2011.09.015.


Enhanced Lipid Diffusion and Mixing in Accelerated Molecular Dynamics.

Wang Y, Markwick P, de Oliveira C, McCammon J J Chem Theory Comput. 2011; 7(10):3199-3207.

PMID: 22003320 PMC: 3191728. DOI: 10.1021/ct200430c.


References
1.
Cheng W . A theoretical description of phase diagrams for nonideal lipid mixtures. Biochim Biophys Acta. 1980; 600(2):358-66. DOI: 10.1016/0005-2736(80)90439-3. View

2.
Sauve R, Ohki S . Interactions of divalent cations with negatively charged membrane surfaces. I. Discrete charge potential. J Theor Biol. 1979; 81(2):157-79. DOI: 10.1016/0022-5193(79)90158-9. View

3.
Cevc G, Watts A, Marsh D . Titration of the phase transition of phosphatidylserine bilayer membranes. Effects of pH, surface electrostatics, ion binding, and head-group hydration. Biochemistry. 1981; 20(17):4955-65. DOI: 10.1021/bi00520a023. View

4.
Mclaughlin A . Phosphorus-31 and carbon-13 nuclear magnetic resonance studies of divalent cation binding to phosphatidylserine membranes: use of cobalt as a paramagnetic probe. Biochemistry. 1982; 21(20):4879-85. DOI: 10.1021/bi00263a008. View

5.
Duniec J, Thorne S . Electrostatic potentials in membrane systems. Bull Math Biol. 1983; 45(1):69-90. DOI: 10.1007/BF02459388. View