» Articles » PMID: 8457388

Clinical Significance of Rapid Ventricular Tachycardia (> 270 Beats Per Minute) Provoked at Programmed Stimulation in Patients Without Confirmed Rapid Ventricular Arrhythmias

Overview
Journal Br Heart J
Date 1993 Jan 1
PMID 8457388
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Rapid uniform ventricular tachycardia (VT) (> 270 beats/min) or ventricular flutter induced during electrophysiological studies is thought not to be clinically significant in patients without cardiac arrest or documented rapid VT. The purpose of the study was to follow up 73 patients with inducible ventricular flutter but without confirmed rapid spontaneous VT. A long follow up (mean 3.5 years) identified two groups of patients. The first group had an excellent outcome and was characterised by a normal 24 hour Holter monitoring. In the second group, however, the risk of cardiac mortality was high (35%) and spontaneous VT was < 270 beats/min (26%) and was characterised by couplets or salvos of extrasystoles on Holter monitoring. In this group the history of syncope and decreased left ejection fraction increased the risk of mortality and VT. The presence of late potentials increased the risk of spontaneous VT. Electrophysiologically guided antiarrhythmic therapy reduced the risk of VT. Ventricular flutter was a non-specific finding in patients with normal Holter monitoring. In contrast, in patients with salvos of extrasystoles, ventricular flutter was associated with a high risk of cardiac mortality and VT.

Citing Articles

Contributions of France to the field of clinical cardiac electrophysiology and pacing.

Belhassen B, Lellouche N, Frank R Heart Rhythm O2. 2024; 5(7):490-514.

PMID: 39119028 PMC: 11305881. DOI: 10.1016/j.hroo.2024.02.005.


Comparative follow up of patients with implanted cardioverter-defibrillators after induction of sustained monomorphic ventricular tachycardias or ventricular fibrillation by programmed stimulation.

Meyborg M, Mura R, Tiefenbacher C, Becker R, Michaelsen J, Niroomand F Heart. 2003; 89(6):629-32.

PMID: 12748217 PMC: 1767667. DOI: 10.1136/heart.89.6.629.

References
1.
Vandepol C, Farshidi A, Spielman S, Greenspan A, Horowitz L, Josephson M . Incidence and clinical significance of induced ventricular tachycardia. Am J Cardiol. 1980; 45(4):725-31. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(80)90114-9. View

2.
Denniss A, Ross D, Richards D, Holley L, Cooper M, Johnson D . Differences between patients with ventricular tachycardia and ventricular fibrillation as assessed by signal-averaged electrocardiogram, radionuclide ventriculography and cardiac mapping. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1988; 11(2):276-83. DOI: 10.1016/0735-1097(88)90092-7. View

3.
Livelli Jr F, BIGGER Jr J, Reiffel J, Gang E, Patton J, Noethling P . Response to programmed ventricular stimulation: sensitivity, specificity and relation to heart disease. Am J Cardiol. 1982; 50(3):452-8. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(82)90309-5. View

4.
Morady F, Higgins J, Peters R, Schwartz A, Shen E, Bhandari A . Electrophysiologic testing in bundle branch block and unexplained syncope. Am J Cardiol. 1984; 54(6):587-91. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9149(84)90254-6. View

5.
Olshansky B, Mazuz M, Martins J . Significance of inducible tachycardia in patients with syncope of unknown origin: a long-term follow-up. J Am Coll Cardiol. 1985; 5(2 Pt 1):216-23. DOI: 10.1016/s0735-1097(85)80040-1. View