» Articles » PMID: 8450876

A Defective Visual Pathway in Children with Reading Disability

Overview
Journal N Engl J Med
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1993 Apr 8
PMID 8450876
Citations 24
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: The possibility that reading disability in children is associated with visual problems is in dispute. We sought to test the existence of this association by using electrophysiologic techniques to measure the processing of visual information in the magnicellular and parvicellular visual pathways of the brain.

Methods: Visual evoked potentials were measured with scalp electrodes in children 8 to 11 years old who were normal readers and in those with reading disability. The potentials were measured for targets with low (0.5 cycle per degree of visual angle) and high (4.5 cycles per degree) spatial frequency, surrounded by either a steady background or a uniform-field flickering 12 times per second. A flickering field normally reduces the amplitude and increases the latency of a transient potential evoked by a low-spatial-frequency target, which preferentially excites the magnicellular visual pathway, but has little effect on the response to a high-spatial-frequency target.

Results: With a steady background, the latencies of the early components (N1 and P1) of the visual evoked potentials were longer in the reading-disabled children than in the normal readers when the low-spatial-frequency target was used, but not when the high-spatial-frequency target was used. In normal readers, the flickering background increased the latency and reduced the amplitude of the early components, whereas in the reading-disabled children only the amplitude was affected. No differences were observed in either group with the high-spatial-frequency target.

Conclusions: The pattern of results suggests that the response of the magnicellular visual pathway is slowed in reading-disabled children, who do not, however, have a general slowing of the visual response. The possibility that there is a cause-and-effect relation between these findings and reading disability will require further study.

Citing Articles

Duration perception for visual stimuli is impaired in dyslexia but deficits in visual processing may not be the culprits.

Catronas D, Sousa J, Batista A, Torres N, Mesquita A, Folia V Sci Rep. 2023; 13(1):12873.

PMID: 37553469 PMC: 10409714. DOI: 10.1038/s41598-023-40081-0.


The relation between the severity of reading disorder and visual functions among children with dyslexia.

Darvishi A, Rad D, Atigh S, Hamidi A, Heravian Shandiz J, Shojaei Baghini A Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2022; 12(2):178-183.

PMID: 35813801 PMC: 9262027. DOI: 10.4103/tjo.tjo_33_21.


Is Developmental Dyslexia Due to a Visual and Not a Phonological Impairment?.

Werth R Brain Sci. 2021; 11(10).

PMID: 34679378 PMC: 8534212. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11101313.


Selecting the Most Relevant Brain Regions to Classify Children with Developmental Dyslexia and Typical Readers by Using Complex Magnocellular Stimuli and Multiple Kernel Learning.

Mascheretti S, Peruzzo D, Andreola C, Villa M, Ciceri T, Trezzi V Brain Sci. 2021; 11(6).

PMID: 34071649 PMC: 8228080. DOI: 10.3390/brainsci11060722.


Visually evoked potentials in boys with developmental dyslexia.

Hennighausen K, Remschmidt H, Warnke A Eur Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2018; 3(2):72-81.

PMID: 29871465 DOI: 10.1007/BF01977669.