» Articles » PMID: 8448975

Aminoglycoside Forecasting in Neutropenic Patients with Cancer

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1993 Jan 1
PMID 8448975
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

To validate the population pharmacokinetic parameters of aminoglycoside disposition in patients with cancer, a retrospective evaluation of predictive performance of a Bayesian program was performed in 155 patients from 1986 to 1989 who received amikacin, gentamicin or tobramycin. Each patient received 1 of the 3 drugs and had initial drug concentration determination, with a second set of drug concentrations drawn < or = 14 days after the initial dose. Predictions of 64 amikacin, 144 gentamicin and 102 tobramycin concentrations were generated using 1-compartment model pharmacokinetic parameters, serum creatinine values, patients' dosage history and demographic data. The mean (+/- SD) observed (and predicted) serum concentrations for amikacin were 18.9 +/- 14.8 mg/L (17.2 +/- 14.1 mg/L); for gentamicin were 4.49 +/- 3.58 mg/L (4.26 +/- 3.33 mg/L) and for tobramycin were 4.52 +/- 3.70 mg/L (4.05 +/- 3.49 mg/L) [p > 0.05]. Results demonstrated minimal bias with a mean error in gentamicin concentrations of -0.236 (95% CI -0.533: 0.0613). Significant (p < 0.05) under prediction occurred in concentrations of tobramycin [-0.474 mg/L (95% CI -0.842: -0.0107)] and amikacin [-1.77 mg/L (95% CI -3.42: -0.114)]. Good precision is indicated by a mean squared error for gentamicin of 3.35 mg/L (95% CI 1.70: 4.99) and for tobramycin of 3.64 mg/L (95% CI 1.83: 5.44). Fair precision is demonstrated by amikacin [46.1 mg/L (95% CI 27.3: 65.0)]. Similar results were shown in a separate peak/trough analysis. These data indicate that aminoglycoside pharmacokinetics in patients with cancer can be predicted with minimal bias and good precision using a Bayesian forecasting program for gentamicin and tobramycin.

Citing Articles

Individualising aminoglycoside dosage regimens after therapeutic drug monitoring: simple or complex pharmacokinetic methods?.

Tod M, Padoin C, Petitjean O Clin Pharmacokinet. 2001; 40(11):803-14.

PMID: 11735603 DOI: 10.2165/00003088-200140110-00002.


Population pharmacokinetic study of amikacin administered once or twice daily to febrile, severely neutropenic adults.

Tod M, Lortholary O, Seytre D, Semaoun R, Uzzan B, Guillevin L Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1998; 42(4):849-56.

PMID: 9559795 PMC: 105554. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.42.4.849.


Development and evaluation of a Bayesian pharmacokinetic estimator and optimal, sparse sampling strategies for ceftazidime.

Kashuba A, Ballow C, Forrest A Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1996; 40(8):1860-5.

PMID: 8843294 PMC: 163430. DOI: 10.1128/AAC.40.8.1860.

References
1.
Burton M, Brater D, Chen P, Day R, HUBER P, Vasko M . A Bayesian feedback method of aminoglycoside dosing. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 1985; 37(3):349-57. DOI: 10.1038/clpt.1985.51. View

2.
Chow M, Deglin J, Harralson A, Bartlett R, Quintiliani R . Prediction of gentamicin serum levels using a one-compartment open linear pharmacokinetic model. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1978; 35(9):1078-81. View

3.
Segal J, Gray D, Gordon S, Eltorai I, Khonsari F . Pharmacokinetics of gentamicin in patients with spinal cord injury. Clin Pharm. 1984; 3(4):418-20. View

4.
Gill M, Kern J . Altered gentamicin distribution in ascitic patients. Am J Hosp Pharm. 1979; 36(12):1704-6. View

5.
Zaske D, Irvine P, Strand L, Strate R, Cipolle R, Rotschafer J . Wide interpatient variations in gentamicin dose requirements for geriatric patients. JAMA. 1982; 248(23):3122-6. View