» Articles » PMID: 8443904

Quantitative Doppler Assessment of Valvular Regurgitation

Overview
Journal Circulation
Date 1993 Mar 1
PMID 8443904
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Quantitation of valvular regurgitation remains a challenge. The accuracy of quantitative Doppler is controversial, and its ability to measure regurgitant volume is unknown; therefore, it is not widely used.

Methods And Results: In 120 patients (20 without regurgitation, 19 with aortic regurgitation, and 81 with mitral regurgitation), the stroke volume through the mitral annulus and left ventricular outflow tract were measured using pulsed-wave Doppler concurrently with left ventricular stroke volume calculated using left ventricular volumes measured by two-dimensional echocardiography Simpson's biapical method. Regurgitant volume and fraction were thus computed using Doppler or ventricular methods. In normal patients there were good correlations between Doppler and left ventricular measurements of stroke volume. Doppler regurgitant volume and fraction were 4.4 +/- 4.4 mL and 5.3 +/- 4.5%, respectively. In patients with aortic regurgitation, there were good correlations between Doppler and left ventricular measurements of stroke volume, regurgitant volume, and regurgitant fraction (r = 0.97, r = 0.95, and r = 0.93, respectively; p < 0.0001). In patients with mitral regurgitation, despite good correlations between Doppler and ventricular methods for stroke volume, regurgitant volume, and regurgitant fraction (r = 0.94, r = 0.93, and r = 0.94, respectively; p < 0.001), these variables were overestimated by Doppler. However, in the last 54 patients compared with the first 27, overestimation decreased significantly for regurgitant volume (5 +/- 10 mL versus 18 +/- 27 mL, p < 0.05) and regurgitant fraction (3.3 +/- 6.7% versus 6.2 +/- 6.8%, p = 0.05).

Conclusions: Quantitative Doppler can be performed in large numbers of patients in a clinical laboratory. Its potential limitation was identified as overestimation of mitral regurgitation, which is overcome with increased experience. Its achieved accuracy in mitral and aortic regurgitation allows measurement not only of regurgitant fraction but most importantly of regurgitant volume.

Citing Articles

Two-dimensional transthoracic measure of mitral annulus in mitral valve prolapse and moderate to severe regurgitation: a method comparison analysis with three-dimensional transesophageal echocardiography.

Berthelot-Richer M, Vakulenko H, Calleja A, Woo A, Thavendiranathan P, Poulin F J Cardiovasc Imaging. 2024; 32(1):2.

PMID: 38907302 PMC: 11177645. DOI: 10.1186/s44348-024-00001-w.


Preoperative echocardiography as a predictor of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension in older patients with mild left ventricular diastolic dysfunction: a retrospective observational study.

Park E, Cho A, Kim H, Lee H, Jeon S, Baik J Anesth Pain Med (Seoul). 2024; 19(2):134-143.

PMID: 38725168 PMC: 11089297. DOI: 10.17085/apm.23161.


Timing of Surgery for Asymptomatic Primary Mitral Regurgitation: Possible Value of Early, Serial Measurements of Left Ventricular Sphericity.

Stanley A, Athanasuleas C Curr Cardiol Rev. 2024; 20(2):93-101.

PMID: 38351687 PMC: 11107465. DOI: 10.2174/011573403X277223240206062319.


Echocardiography vs. CMR in the Quantification of Chronic Mitral Regurgitation: A Happy Marriage or Stormy Divorce?.

Baessato F, Fusini L, Muratori M, Tamborini G, Ali S, Mantegazza V J Cardiovasc Dev Dis. 2023; 10(4).

PMID: 37103029 PMC: 10145831. DOI: 10.3390/jcdd10040150.


Quantification of primary mitral regurgitation by echocardiography: A practical appraisal.

Altes A, Vermes E, Levy F, Vancraeynest D, Pasquet A, Vincentelli A Front Cardiovasc Med. 2023; 10:1107724.

PMID: 36970355 PMC: 10036770. DOI: 10.3389/fcvm.2023.1107724.