» Articles » PMID: 8443695

Cross-calibration of DXA Equipment: Upgrading from a Hologic QDR 1000/W to a QDR 2000

Overview
Specialty Pathology
Date 1993 Feb 1
PMID 8443695
Citations 14
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In this study, the cross-calibration of a fan beam DXA system (Hologic QDR-2000) to a pencil beam scanner from the same manufacturer (Hologic QDR-1000/W) is described. The scanners were calibrated by the manufacturer using the same anthropomorphic spine phantom at installation. To verify consistent machine calibration, a group of 69 female subjects, aged 46-75, had anteroposterior (AP) spine and proximal femur scans on the QDR-1000/W followed by pencil and array scans of the same sites on the QDR-2000 during the same visit. Many of the subjects had bilateral examinations of the proximal femur for a total of 123 hip scans. Pencil and array area, bone mineral content (BMC), and bone mineral density (BMD) from the QDR-2000 were compared with the values obtained on the QDR-1000/W, and linear regression equations were derived for relating the two instruments. At the spine, no differences were found between the QDR-1000/W BMD values and the QDR-2000 array BMD values. A slight difference between pencil beam modes was detected but was not deemed clinically significant. Linear regression models relating the QDR-2000 and QDR-1000/W AP spine BMD measurements showed correlation coefficients greater than 0.99, with slopes of 1.00, intercepts equivalent to zero, and small root mean square errors. Comparisons at the proximal femur showed equivalency at the femoral neck and trochanter regions for the two machines in pencil mode, but slight increases in BMC and BMD at the other femoral sites on the QDR-2000 in both pencil and array mode. Correlation coefficients were 0.97-0.99 for all measurement regions except for Ward's.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)

Citing Articles

The choice of normative pediatric reference database changes spine bone mineral density Z-scores but not the relationship between bone mineral density and prevalent vertebral fractures.

Ma J, Siminoski K, Alos N, Halton J, Ho J, Lentle B J Clin Endocrinol Metab. 2014; 100(3):1018-27.

PMID: 25494661 PMC: 4519277. DOI: 10.1210/jc.2014-3096.


Bone quality assessment for total hip arthroplasty with intraoperative trabecular torque measurements.

Klotz M, Beckmann N, Bitsch R, Seebach E, Reiner T, Jager S J Orthop Surg Res. 2014; 9:109.

PMID: 25391790 PMC: 4251677. DOI: 10.1186/s13018-014-0109-0.


Quality Control of DXA System and Precision Test of Radio-technologists.

Kim H, Yang S J Bone Metab. 2014; 21(1):2-7.

PMID: 24707462 PMC: 3970299. DOI: 10.11005/jbm.2014.21.1.2.


Measurements of bone mineral density in the lumbar spine and proximal femur using lunar prodigy and the new pencil-beam dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry.

Choi D, Kim D, Han C, Kim S, Bok H, Huh W Skeletal Radiol. 2009; 39(11):1109-16.

PMID: 19924413 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-009-0828-1.


Bone mineral measurements of subchondral and trabecular bone in healthy and osteoporotic rabbits.

Castaneda S, Largo R, Calvo E, Rodriguez-Salvanes F, Marcos M, Diaz-Curiel M Skeletal Radiol. 2005; 35(1):34-41.

PMID: 16247642 DOI: 10.1007/s00256-005-0022-z.


References
1.
Lilley J, Walters B, Heath D, Drolc Z . In vivo and in vitro precision for bone density measured by dual-energy X-ray absorption. Osteoporos Int. 1991; 1(3):141-6. DOI: 10.1007/BF01625443. View

2.
Gluer C, Steiger P, Selvidge R, Hayashi C, Genant H . Comparative assessment of dual-photon absorptiometry and dual-energy radiography. Radiology. 1990; 174(1):223-8. DOI: 10.1148/radiology.174.1.2294552. View

3.
Sartoris D, Resnick D . Dual-energy radiographic absorptiometry for bone densitometry: current status and perspective. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 1989; 152(2):241-6. DOI: 10.2214/ajr.152.2.241. View