» Articles » PMID: 8440395

Generation, Ethnicity, and Marriage: Historical Patterns in the Northern United States

Overview
Journal Demography
Specialty Public Health
Date 1993 Feb 1
PMID 8440395
Citations 5
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Immigration was a prominent feature of American life during the early decades of the twentieth century. About 40% of the white population was of foreign birth or parentage, and immigrants were increasingly from diverse national origins. Using data from the Public Use Microdata Sample of the 1910 U.S. Census, we examine generational and ethnic differences in marital timing. The analysis reveals a striking pattern of delayed marriage among native whites with foreign parents, but marked ethnic variation in the extent of marriage delay within the second generation. We hypothesize that locational factors, especially diverse economic opportunities, were important in shaping this marriage pattern. Separate multilevel analyses are conducted for females and for males living in urban and in rural places. Although significant effects for a variety of contextual factors are found, generational and ethnic differences in nuptial timing persist in multivariate models.

Citing Articles

Becoming American: Intermarriage during the Great Migration to the United States.

Martin D, Hacker J, Francesco S J Interdiscip Hist. 2019; 49(2):189-218.

PMID: 31527926 PMC: 6746435. DOI: 10.1162/jinh_a_01266.


Mapping Gender and Migration in Sociological Scholarship: Is It Segregation or Integration?.

Curran S, Shafer S, Donato K, Garip F Int Migr Rev. 2016; 40(1):199-223.

PMID: 27478289 PMC: 4962787. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2006.00008.x.


Immigrant Incorporation in American Cities: Contextual Determinants of Irish, German and British Intermarriage in 1880.

Logan J, Shin H Int Migr Rev. 2013; 46(3).

PMID: 24259757 PMC: 3832263. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-7379.2012.00902.x.


A comparative perspective on intermarriage: explaining differences among national-origin groups in the United States.

Kalmijn M, van Tubergen F Demography. 2010; 47(2):459-79.

PMID: 20608106 PMC: 3000021. DOI: 10.1353/dem.0.0103.


Immigrant characteristics and Hispanic-Anglo housing inequality.

Krivo L Demography. 1995; 32(4):599-615.

PMID: 8925949

References
1.
Carlson E . The impact of international migration upon the timing of marriage and childbearing. Demography. 1985; 22(1):61-72. View

2.
Guest A . Fertility variation among the U.S. foreign stock population in 1900. Int Migr Rev. 1982; 16(3):577-94. View

3.
Waldinger R . Immigration and urban change. Annu Rev Sociol. 1989; 15:211-32. DOI: 10.1146/annurev.so.15.080189.001235. View

4.
King M, Ruggles S . American immigration, fertility, and race suicide at the turn of the century. J Interdiscip Hist. 1990; 20(3):347-69. View

5.
Goldscheider C, Uhlenberg P . Minority group status and fertility. AJS. 1969; 74(4):361-72. DOI: 10.1086/224662. View