Differentiation of Multi-infarct and Alzheimer Dementia by Intracranial Hemodynamic Parameters
Overview
Neurology
Authors
Affiliations
Background And Purpose: The differentiation between the Alzheimer and multi-infarct types of dementia may still be equivocal considering clinical criteria, neuropsychological tests, and imaging techniques. Cerebral microangiopathic alterations underlying multi-infarct dementia should allow the characterization of dementia subgroups.
Methods: Patients with a diagnosis of multi-infarct dementia (n = 17; mean age, 69.1 +/- 8.5 years) or Alzheimer dementia (n = 24, mean age, 65.8 +/- 9.0 years) according to standard testing criteria, clinical findings, and neuroimaging techniques (computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging) were investigated prospectively by transcranial Doppler sonography and compared with a normal reference group (n = 64; mean age, 61.0 +/- 11.1 years). Transcranial Doppler sonography allows an indirect evaluation of peripheral flow resistance in the microcirculatory bed by quantifying pulsatility characteristics, as reflected in the effective pulsatility range (time-averaged mean blood flow velocity minus the peak-systolic to end-diastolic amplitude, in centimeters per second).
Results: A total of 204 vessels were investigated in 105 subjects. Mean and diastolic blood flow velocities as well as the effective pulsatility range were significantly lower in the multi-infarct dementia group compared with the Alzheimer and the normal reference groups (p < 0.001). By using receiver operating characteristic analysis, a cutoff point for effective pulsatility range values of -5 cm/sec gives a side-dependent sensitivity of 90.48-95.24% and a specificity of 64.71-70.59% in diagnosing Alzheimer-type dementia; the corresponding sensitivity and specificity for a value of -2 cm/sec are 82.35-88.24% and 80.95-90.48%, respectively.
Conclusions: Pulsatility changes as reflected by the effective pulsatility range are a noninvasive additional criterion in the differential diagnosis of dementia.
Vagiakis I, Bakirtzis C, Andravizou A, Pirounides D Healthcare (Basel). 2024; 12(16).
PMID: 39201148 PMC: 11353459. DOI: 10.3390/healthcare12161589.
Fresnais D, Ihle-Hansen H, Lundstrom E, Andersson A, Fure B Dement Geriatr Cogn Disord. 2023; 52(5-6):277-295.
PMID: 38008061 PMC: 10911167. DOI: 10.1159/000535422.
Chiara C, Gilda C, Daniela M, Antonio C, Miriana M, Marcello M Front Aging Neurosci. 2022; 14:993621.
PMID: 36420311 PMC: 9678013. DOI: 10.3389/fnagi.2022.993621.
Szegedi S, Dal-Bianco P, Stogmann E, Traub-Weidinger T, Rainer M, Masching A Acta Ophthalmol. 2020; 98(7):e914-e921.
PMID: 32212415 PMC: 7687124. DOI: 10.1111/aos.14419.
Ultrasound and dynamic functional imaging in vascular cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's disease.
Malojcic B, Giannakopoulos P, Sorond F, Azevedo E, Diomedi M, Oblak J BMC Med. 2017; 15(1):27.
PMID: 28178960 PMC: 5299782. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-017-0799-3.